Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Article: "Teams should not wear black jerseys"


PanthersATL
 Share

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

ACKCHYUALLY hair face facial expression person nose text human behavior smile emotion male head cartoon forehead hairstyle cheek clip art black and white eyewear boy vision care

Black "Panthers" do not exist, they are just black jaguars/leopards.

Our mascot is as real as Unicorns and Dragons. We could make our main color whatever we wanted and it would work. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_panther

My apologies for being "that guy"

What is this pseudoscience in which you speak?

in name the name of science, how dare ye cite your resource of your sorcery from Wikipedia??

major faux pas my friend.

 

I would be willing to bet you tell children that Santa Claus isn't real.

How do you sleep at night? 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our team name is beyond lazy. Our logo sucks (meaning behind it is fine). The electric blue accent was a mistake to add from the start as it's not Carolina blue. Black is indeed boring by itself, and our silver doesn't do anything to enhance it. I'm an outlier who thinks our all whites are the best look. Black/Silver/White is Raiders. Our all blues or blue/white or blue/black looks hideous. It's all trash. Just like our mediocre franchise lol.

Get in a time machine and start all over again. New name, new color scheme, etc.

#fashionpolice

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Our team name is beyond lazy. Our logo sucks (meaning behind it is fine). The electric blue accent was a mistake to add from the start as it's not Carolina blue. Black is indeed boring by itself, and our silver doesn't do anything to enhance it. I'm an outlier who thinks our all whites are the best look. Black/Silver/White is Raiders. Our all blues or blue/white or blue/black looks hideous. It's all trash. Just like our mediocre franchise lol.

Get in a time machine and start all over again. New name, new color scheme, etc.

#fashionpolice

It is genuinely fascinating the level to which you despise literally every single aspect of this franchise, down to the most granular detail. Makes one wonder why you even call yourself a fan of it. 

Edited by travisura
  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Our team name is beyond lazy. Our logo sucks (meaning behind it is fine). The electric blue accent was a mistake to add from the start as it's not Carolina blue. Black is indeed boring by itself, and our silver doesn't do anything to enhance it. I'm an outlier who thinks our all whites are the best look. Black/Silver/White is Raiders. Our all blues or blue/white or blue/black looks hideous. It's all trash. Just like our mediocre franchise lol.

Get in a time machine and start all over again. New name, new color scheme, etc.

#fashionpolice

Keep in mind, some of the most hideous specialty uniforms in the league is because the league started to go down the path with Nike of "Oregonizing" the NFL.  That trend seems to be waning, as most of the uniform redesigns are teams going back to previous designs.  And the color rush stuff should have been nixed before it got off the drawing board.

I'm a St. Louis Blues fan, and they once had these

Ranking the worst 25 uniforms in NHL history - Article - Bardown

They never wore them.  They were to be worn at least once, and when the coach at the time walked into the locker room and saw them hanging in the lockers, he told the equipment manager to replace them with their normal dark sweaters at once.

That should have been the fate of most of the color rush clown outfits in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has altered my view. 
 

I hated how long we waited to do all black and black helmets, since it felt like the whole league played out all black. It became boring. It made me less enthused when we did it, even though it looked cool.

 

However…fug all the teams that ran all black for no reason.

 

Panthers, Ravens, with an honorable mention to the Bengals. Those teams make sense. fug the rest. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...