Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Article: "Teams should not wear black jerseys"


PanthersATL
 Share

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

ACKCHYUALLY hair face facial expression person nose text human behavior smile emotion male head cartoon forehead hairstyle cheek clip art black and white eyewear boy vision care

Black "Panthers" do not exist, they are just black jaguars/leopards.

Our mascot is as real as Unicorns and Dragons. We could make our main color whatever we wanted and it would work. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_panther

My apologies for being "that guy"

What is this pseudoscience in which you speak?

in name the name of science, how dare ye cite your resource of your sorcery from Wikipedia??

major faux pas my friend.

 

I would be willing to bet you tell children that Santa Claus isn't real.

How do you sleep at night? 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our team name is beyond lazy. Our logo sucks (meaning behind it is fine). The electric blue accent was a mistake to add from the start as it's not Carolina blue. Black is indeed boring by itself, and our silver doesn't do anything to enhance it. I'm an outlier who thinks our all whites are the best look. Black/Silver/White is Raiders. Our all blues or blue/white or blue/black looks hideous. It's all trash. Just like our mediocre franchise lol.

Get in a time machine and start all over again. New name, new color scheme, etc.

#fashionpolice

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Our team name is beyond lazy. Our logo sucks (meaning behind it is fine). The electric blue accent was a mistake to add from the start as it's not Carolina blue. Black is indeed boring by itself, and our silver doesn't do anything to enhance it. I'm an outlier who thinks our all whites are the best look. Black/Silver/White is Raiders. Our all blues or blue/white or blue/black looks hideous. It's all trash. Just like our mediocre franchise lol.

Get in a time machine and start all over again. New name, new color scheme, etc.

#fashionpolice

It is genuinely fascinating the level to which you despise literally every single aspect of this franchise, down to the most granular detail. Makes one wonder why you even call yourself a fan of it. 

Edited by travisura
  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Our team name is beyond lazy. Our logo sucks (meaning behind it is fine). The electric blue accent was a mistake to add from the start as it's not Carolina blue. Black is indeed boring by itself, and our silver doesn't do anything to enhance it. I'm an outlier who thinks our all whites are the best look. Black/Silver/White is Raiders. Our all blues or blue/white or blue/black looks hideous. It's all trash. Just like our mediocre franchise lol.

Get in a time machine and start all over again. New name, new color scheme, etc.

#fashionpolice

Keep in mind, some of the most hideous specialty uniforms in the league is because the league started to go down the path with Nike of "Oregonizing" the NFL.  That trend seems to be waning, as most of the uniform redesigns are teams going back to previous designs.  And the color rush stuff should have been nixed before it got off the drawing board.

I'm a St. Louis Blues fan, and they once had these

Ranking the worst 25 uniforms in NHL history - Article - Bardown

They never wore them.  They were to be worn at least once, and when the coach at the time walked into the locker room and saw them hanging in the lockers, he told the equipment manager to replace them with their normal dark sweaters at once.

That should have been the fate of most of the color rush clown outfits in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has altered my view. 
 

I hated how long we waited to do all black and black helmets, since it felt like the whole league played out all black. It became boring. It made me less enthused when we did it, even though it looked cool.

 

However…fug all the teams that ran all black for no reason.

 

Panthers, Ravens, with an honorable mention to the Bengals. Those teams make sense. fug the rest. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just chasing targets is a fools game. Chase averaged 85 yrds and .76 TDs per game his first year and 87.16 yrds, and .75 TD's per game his second year. Statistically the same. NOT an improvement. Puka saw no increase either. Yes, Waddle's went down because he had to share targets with another receiver - just like TMac will have to share targets with Coker next year so you have actually just made my point concerning Coker. Olave saw an increase in targets but Carr replaced Dalton and even with the increase in targets, his production was pretty flat (83 extra yards and 1 more TD for the entire year). And Wilson's number did increase but the Jets replaced the other two receivers and their contribution was significantly down from Davis's and Moore's. Again, nothing in those numbers should lead anyone to believe there will be a big leap for Tmac next year.       
    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
×
×
  • Create New...