Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Undo 1 Rhule Decision


CanadianCat
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

What if games are for kids. 

What ifs are built into the very fabric of language, specifically the one you are typing in. 
 

A foundational characteristic of human beings is the concept of future and past, so what ifs are used consistently for analyzing the past (such as this thread) and for theorizing the future. Such future what if thinking might be eating less food today so you have some for tomorrow (or so you won’t gain weight over time, etc) and other planning.
 

So what ifs aren’t just for kids, but are used by every person, many times daily, all the time. 
 

And that includes you.

 

Now if you are saying we are all kids no matter the age, I might agree with that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How could anyone say, "Releasing Cam?"  He was coming off surgery and has never recovered.  He would have commanded a $100m salary.  I mean, if he went on to take NE to the Super Bowl and was still starting somewhere, I might agree.

It was not Rhule who disrespected Cam.  It was Ron Rivera (the way he used Cam and the way they avoided spending on an OL).

 

Just my 2c,  but signing Cam would have been terrible.  Not a Rhule supporter, but there is no room for blind loyalty in the NFL.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

What ifs are built into the very fabric of language, specifically the one you are typing in. 
 

A foundational characteristic of human beings is the concept of future and past, so what ifs are used consistently for analyzing the past (such as this thread) and for theorizing the future. Such future what if thinking might be eating less food today so you have some for tomorrow (or so you won’t gain weight over time, etc) and other planning.
 

So what ifs aren’t just for kids, but are used by every person, many times daily, all the time. 
 

And that includes you.

 

Now if you are saying we are all kids no matter the age, I might agree with that. 

What if games is a child's game. Meaning immature.  

I don't care how you look at it. 

 I don't play such stupidity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CanadianCat said:

I dont think cutting Cam was an issue. Remember Cam had 1 year left on his contract and was coming off an injured shoulder and a poor season. Reports were that Cam wanted a new contract.

So with all of that I think the coaching staff had to go look for an alternative. 

Cam was never going to come back on a 1 year contract. 

Should have called his bluff. I’ve always thought that. If Cam was willing to risk his career holding out when everyone had valid concerns about whether he still had it; let him. Instead they pulled the plug so they could move quickly on Bridgewater. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

100% punt the 2020 coofus season. 

Never sign Teeddddy2gloves

Come to terms with cutting Cam after 4 cry sessions

Dont trade tri"got my bag now I quit" turner for okung ""giimmie bitcoins""

Stock pile picks for 2021 

Stack cap space for 2021 

Go hard in 2021 given 100+ million in cap space and 13+/- draft picks. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cutting Cam and hiring Bridgewater.  I consider them both part of one decision.  Best to let Cam play out his final year, see if he has anything left.  If not, draft a qb and more on.  

The Cam/Bridgewater thing was the first of several baffling decisions at qb that still make no sense at all.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Cutting Cam and hiring Bridgewater.  I consider them both part of one decision.  Best to let Cam play out his final year, see if he has anything left.  If not, draft a qb and more on.  

its painful to say, but cutting cam and NOT signing teddy were the right moves with hindsight cheats....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The problem that Bryce faces is his lack of prototypical tools.  He's not the tall, strong armed mobile QB that tends to get drafted first overall.  His game is not played in underwear on a practice field.  His best asset are his intangibles.  They aren't sexy like a cannon arm or a fast 40 yard dash. OK, so we took the lesser athlete.  Bryce put up a pretty bad season with a bad team around him.  The coaching staff, for all it's platitudes, sucked.  They made sure Bryce could run a huddle, but didn't help him get better as a player.  Bad choice. Compare that to what other teams did to their Rookies:  they put them in position to succeed with better personnel and better play calling.  Sure, there are physical differences which are going to affect the outcomes, but you can't change it. Am I trying to ride to the defense of Bryce?  Only a little.  He's my favorite team's QB, and I believe in him.  Now, he's got this year to show that he's "the No. 1 for a reason" (Thanks CJ Stroud).  Will he, won't he?  I don't know at all.  That's on the D&D crew to put Bryce is position to play well.  Running the ball is going to make things a lot easier for Bryce.  Does that discount his success if he plays well?  For some of y'all it will.  Some of y'all just don't like Bryce, like he stole you DoorDash or something. Regardless, let's see what happens in 2024.  If Bryce stinks it up, then we're going back to the QB well again.  
    • we may think we know, but we don't know. we won't know what effect upgrades on the OL, coaching staff, and WR room will have. we don't know what scheme canales is going to put together. we don't know a lot of things.  that's why we play the games...to see what shakes out. plenty of reasons to think Bryce is limited this year...again. Plenty of reasons to see an improvement in his play. 
    • He did not elevate the players around him, but they de-elevated their QB.  A QB like Bryce needs a system, a strong OL, a Running game, and WRs that can get open.  Call him a manager at best, but so is a point guard.  That is all we should need.  He is smart enough to grow into a very effective player.  I once saw a Coach talking about the OL--i forget who it was Schottenheimer comes to mind--and he said, you can succeed if you have one weak link on the OL.  If you get 2 weak links, success comes 10x harder.  If you get three weak links, your season is over.  Your QB is injured, and you are unemployed (paraphrasing).  I would say that we had 4 weak links (Icky does not get a pass) and a RB who was not good at pass blocking. I am not saying the Bryce is the answer at QB--but I am saying we don't know yet. I know QBs (college) and when the OL sucks, they collapse mentally over time.  That is what we saw--a QB who had never played without the advantage.
×
×
  • Create New...