Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers settle practice site suit for $100 million


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

.”"But York County released a statement after reaching its deal with Tepper saying the owner and his company “have acted in good faith,” and that the county “believes that no action of any kind with respect to the county payment is warranted"

 

Epic embarrassment lol You guys slay me. Couldn't bother to read the article, but still felt comfortable trashing Tepper. Over nothing. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cullenator said:

The huddle MBAs are here to tell us how to run multi billion dollar organizations

 

2 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

.”"But York County released a statement after reaching its deal with Tepper saying the owner and his company “have acted in good faith,” and that the county “believes that no action of any kind with respect to the county payment is warranted"

 

Epic embarrassment lol You guys slay me. Couldn't bother to read the article, but still felt comfortable trashing Tepper. Over nothing. 

So much win right? Keep kissing ass thinking you're going to win a prize. Maybe Tepper will read this 🫡

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, frankw said:

 

So much win right? Keep kissing ass thinking you're going to win a prize. Maybe Tepper will read this 🫡

Gerry Green, Rippadong, and catfan69 are possibly the same person. If not what are the chances of getting 3 guys that special on one small team forum

  • Pie 4
  • The D 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gerry Green said:

.”"But York County released a statement after reaching its deal with Tepper saying the owner and his company “have acted in good faith,” and that the county “believes that no action of any kind with respect to the county payment is warranted"

 

Epic embarrassment lol You guys slay me. Couldn't bother to read the article, but still felt comfortable trashing Tepper. Over nothing. 

Yes, after reaching a deal/settlement. And as part of that settlement lawsuits were dropped. With respect to the payment. As in Tepper paid for his mistake. That is also in the article…this is PR fluff talk. Surely you understand that?

You could say he’s a nice guy for paying for his mistake I suppose. However it did take a federal judge to sort this out. What that means is it wasn’t mutual.

Oh yea and he’s still under investigation;

“Tepper and his company remain under investigation by York County Sheriff Kevin Tolson and Solicitor Kevin Brackett for possible misuse of public money.”

 

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Gerry Green said:

.”"But York County released a statement after reaching its deal with Tepper saying the owner and his company “have acted in good faith,” and that the county “believes that no action of any kind with respect to the county payment is warranted"

 

Epic embarrassment lol You guys slay me. Couldn't bother to read the article, but still felt comfortable trashing Tepper. Over nothing. 

You do realize that this is boiler-player nonsense spouted by the recipients of settled largess in a lawsuit, right?

  • Pie 3
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Gerry Green said:

.”"But York County released a statement after reaching its deal with Tepper saying the owner and his company “have acted in good faith,” and that the county “believes that no action of any kind with respect to the county payment is warranted"

 

Epic embarrassment lol You guys slay me. Couldn't bother to read the article, but still felt comfortable trashing Tepper. Over nothing. 

Because they settled…. I don’t think you know how this works. No action WITH RESPECT to the payment, they settled on a huge sum of money to not take further action.

  • Pie 2
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...