Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Blame Game

SZ James (banned)

By SZ James (banned),
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Who's THE MOST to blame?  

98 members have voted

  1. 1. Who's THE MOST to blame? - Choose Carefully

    • Steve Wilks
      18
    • Ekwonu
      0
    • Keith Taylor Jr.
      20
    • Sam Darnold
      2
    • The Running-backs
      0
    • McAdoo
      13
    • The Entire D-line
      3
    • The Entire O-line
      7
    • The Entire Secondary
      4
    • The Entire Offense
      0
    • The Entire Defense
      19
    • TUBA HOWARD!!!!!
      1
    • Other...
      11

Recommended Posts

Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

Really solid game by Sam. He had a few throws that were off, but he took care of the football and had one of his better games. The sacks he took were either from coverage, or Ekwonu getting beat.

(Ickey got pancaked by a safety on one play?)
 

Defense was a complete joke today, absolutely laughable.

That was Christensen that got pancaked.  But to be fair he also got tripped by Bozeman as he was stepping back as he was trying to brace himself. 

Bozeman got abused the most out of all the olineman. But they all got their asses handed to them.

The defense however...where do I start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
59 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

Sorry Frank that is just simply not true. 

Darnold still can't even get over the 59% completion hump. Trubisky is bad and even he has 64% for his career. Sam Darnold is a backup at best and will likely be gone next season and we can and will acquire an upgrade over what he has to offer. You don't have to like the facts but that's the rub bud.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmokinwithWilly Grand Master

SmokinwithWilly

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, frankw said:

Darnold still can't even get over the 59% completion hump. Trubisky is bad and even he has 64% for his career. Sam Darnold is a backup at best and will likely be gone next season and we can and will acquire an upgrade over what he has to offer. You don't have to like the facts but that's the rub bud.

Trubisky is a backup that was benched for an unprepared rookie because he was playing so poorly. Neither one are guys you want to rely on, but the loss today was far less Sam than anyone else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
YourLastThought Mentor

YourLastThought

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, frankw said:

Outperformed by Mitch Trubisky. Find a better QB to cape for dude.

Does not matter how Trubisky played. It's as simple as Darnold did not MAKE us lose today whether you like it or not. Im no Darnold is the future supporter but I can see obvious when it sits in front of me. He did not play all world but he as well did not kill us to pieces and make us lose either. Is that make trying to "cape" for Darnold? Nope it's just the simple facts.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, YourLastThought said:

Does not matter how Trubisky played. It's as simple as Darnold did not MAKE us lose today whether you like it or not. Im no Darnold is the future supporter but I can see obvious when it sits in front of me. He did not play all world but he as well did not kill us to pieces and make us lose either. Is that make trying to "cape" for Darnold? Nope it's just the simple facts.

People said the same stuff about Baker before he got truly exposed. Sam already has been exposed. Only Panthers fans are foolish enough to have forgotten it already. Every QB on this team currently can be removed and upgraded at some level. That's the simple facts. And until we do that none of the other factors you mentioned matter anyway. When we went down 7 I knew the game was over regardless. And let's be clear about it. The coaches know Sam would have turned the ball over eventually. They purposely held him back. Yet you want to celebrate because he didn't do anything terrible. How ridiculous.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites
glenwo2 Grand Master

glenwo2

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, frankw said:

People said the same stuff about Baker before he got truly exposed. Sam already has been exposed. Only Panthers fans are foolish enough to have forgotten it already. Every QB on this team currently can be removed and upgraded at some level. That's the simple facts. And until we do that none of the other factors you mentioned matter anyway. When we went down 7 I knew the game was over regardless.

Even when they tied them back up at 7-7?

I think the game was over once it became 14-7 and was shown that the Defense couldn't stop anyone.  

Edited by glenwo2
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Micah officially requests a trade

      By TD alt · Posted

      You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • pantherclaw
      Micah officially requests a trade

      By pantherclaw · Posted

      Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
    • pantherclaw
      Micah officially requests a trade

      By pantherclaw · Posted

      Fair response.  
×
×
  • Create New...