Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Drafting a QB is a total crap shoot according to a Hall of Fame QB.


Panthercougar68
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Smithers said:

A year or two ago a Huddler posted some stats about “hit” rates per position per round.  QBs were pretty far down the list even in round 1.  It’s by far the hardest position to evaluate when it comes to transitioning to the nfl 

I actually think the whole "Qbs bust more than anyone else" thing is a bit overstated. They're one of the harder groups but year to year it depends, sometimes they aren't as bad as others. Some analyses suggest other positions can be more prone to busts: https://walterfootball.com/nfldraftoffensivetackles.php https://theriotreport.com/more-than-50-of-first-round-picks-are-busts-and-other-terrifying-draft-statistics/2/ https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2441018-which-positions-are-the-safest-riskiest-at-the-top-of-the-nfl-draft

Kinda seems like QBs have one of the highest bust rates (not the highest) but also if they're first round hits they tend to be very good.  Not surprising tbh given QBs are drafted for their potential as much as existing ability.

Edited by mav1234
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's amazing to me how Panthers fans try to talk themselves out of taking a QB every year and then inevitably bitch about our sorry QB play every year.

You know what a highly drafted QB definitely does? It gives you some hope. At least briefly. Isn't everyone ready for SOMETHING to be hopeful about with the Carolina Panthers?

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

I actually think the whole "Qbs bust more than anyone else" thing is a bit overstated. They're one of the harder groups but year to year it depends, sometimes they aren't as bad as others. Some analyses suggest other positions can be more prone to busts: https://walterfootball.com/nfldraftoffensivetackles.php https://theriotreport.com/more-than-50-of-first-round-picks-are-busts-and-other-terrifying-draft-statistics/2/ https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2441018-which-positions-are-the-safest-riskiest-at-the-top-of-the-nfl-draft

Kinda seems like QBs have one of the highest bust rates (not the highest) but also if they're first round hits they tend to be very good.  Not surprising tbh given QBs are drafted for their potential as much as existing ability.

Thanks for sharing these links - great insight.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's amazing to me how Panthers fans try to talk themselves out of taking a QB every year and then inevitably hitch about our sorry QB play every year.

You know what a highly drafted QB definitely does? It gives you some hope. At least briefly. Isn't everyone ready for SOMETHING to be hopeful about with the Carolina Panthers?

I’m a fan of taking a QB every single year.  Even if it’s a mid/late round pick. The position is too important to not use a pick on one. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what is most important here is coaching. The worst teams pick first because they have the worst records and mostly the worst coaching. QB is the most important position on the field. Without the coaching, the QB they draft is set up to fail. Whats going on here is coaches failing the player, not the other way around. If a team has a good QB coach and OC, they will have a better shot at not busting after drafting a QB high.

Edited by KillerKat
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, yes, there is a difference between looking at a box score and watching film.  But PFF has a big subjective aspect to some of their grades.  That's how you get a 2/4 being better than 3/5 with a TD.  You aren't using stats at that point or factual events, but subjective analysis of plays.   And it's not like it is the same subjective analysis applying across all the players.   Same guy grading BY's incompletions (which are putting him over the top) isn't grading everyone else's incompletions and completions.  So it's different subjective takes/viewpoints applied.  There is no way everyone at PFF views grading out a play the same.  Then it all dumps into the same spreadsheet.  Hit the sort button.  Sometimes I feel it gets really weird and and collective data starts saying some weird stuff that just isn't true.   
    • Yeah, Sanders had a very nice debut preseason performance but the folks acting like he's arrived based on that performance are getting way out ahead of themselves.
    • I won't be surprised if Graham disappoints. Maybe not outright bust but never lives up to his draft status. The more I watched him at Michigan the more I came away impressed by the other Michigan DT. I think he might be the real player. Usually when you have two high level prospects in the same college unit one of them ends up getting fraud checked in the NFL as being largely carried by the other guy. Peppers and Ryan Sims at UNC comes to mind. Lavar Arrington and Courtney Brown at Penn State, etc.
×
×
  • Create New...