Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What's your offer to Chicago?


BrisbanePanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, YourLastThought said:

Offer nothing and draft a QB where we find ourselves drafting in order. Save those draft picks. Stroud and Young are not guaranteed no more than anyone else is.

You know, the best QB to come out of last year's draft may be Mr. Irrelevant. You never know. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like a broken record: but it depends on who is the coach next year.  How in love are they with a player?  Can they make this player alter the franchise?

After SF gave up the farm for Tray Lance, teams are going to expect similar compensation.  If Chicago doesn't get the haul they want, they can still pick a franchise altering player and not look back.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, d-dave said:

I feel like a broken record: but it depends on who is the coach next year.  How in love are they with a player?  Can they make this player alter the franchise?

After SF gave up the farm for Tray Lance, teams are going to expect similar compensation.  If Chicago doesn't get the haul they want, they can still pick a franchise altering player and not look back.  

Chicago will take Carter or Anderson if they can’t trade back. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

wait, wut?

You’ve seen the blueprint since Cam broke down right? Mortgaging you’re draft capital when you have holes everywhere is a biggest of gambles. How many times have we seen this franchise win meaningless games pushing us out of range for a QB? I wasn’t a fan of Fields but Fields made more sense than a CB...when we had no QB. 

Edited by Wanderlai
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Wanderlai said:

You’ve seen the blueprint since Cam broke down right? Mortgaging you’re draft capital when you have holes everywhere is a biggest of gambles. How many times have we seen this franchise win meaningless games pushing us out of range for a QB? I wasn’t a fan of Fields but Fields made more sense than a CB...when we had no QB. 

How drunk are you right now?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Wanderlai said:

Nothing. First off Im guessing Chicago keeps the QB they draft and move Fields. Carolina has to learn their lesson. Commit to sucking for draft position or learn to live with cast off reject QBs. 

Chicago is not trading Justin Fields. They are not drafting a QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

I get the feeling you love being contrarian for the fun of it haha

Not contrarian. It's well known a vast majority of 1st round QBs do not turn out to be worth a 1st round pick. The data proves that is the majority opinion. I am just pointing out why they are not worth a 1st round pick if the goal is to build a championship team with draft capital.

Most of you are too hopeful as if you are purchasing a lottery ticket with a 1st round QB (especially a top 15 pick).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...