Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bye Bye Wilks


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Kentucky Panther said:

For the love of god, now that this game is lost, please don’t win next weekend. Let the saints have it. Let’s fire Wilks, get an offensive guy, and draft our future QB. 

Next week's game is going to be like the Little League World Series episode of South Park. Neither team benefits at all from winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

Up 14-0

4th and a foot at midfield

The very definition of "foot on their throat"

Punt your job away

This was an unbelievably GUTLESS call by Wilks.

4th and a foot and you punt when you have a freight train like Foreman who can crash in there and move the pile OR even Sam who is pretty good at QB Sneaking for a yard.  

This is the moment where Wilks lost any shot of being the Head Coach of this team. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wilks only had one job and that was to lose and he couldn’t have done that right. If we would have made the playoff we wouldn’t have made it because we were good, we would have made it because Tampa was horrible and our division sucked. Wilks is a sub.500 coach who has never beaten a winning team. Seahawks aren’t a winning team and had a weak schedule. You honestly want to keep a sub.500 coach? Don’t give me that Bs that we don’t have a qb, look at the giants who play in the toughest division, no qb, no WRs. 49ers are down to their 3rd sting qb and still win.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, rmoneyg35 said:

Wilks only had one job and that was to lose and he couldn’t have done that right. If we would have made the playoff we wouldn’t have made it because we were good, we would have made it because Tampa was horrible and our division sucked. Wilks is a sub.500 coach who has never beaten a winning team. Seahawks aren’t a winning team and had a weak schedule. You honestly want to keep a sub.500 coach? Don’t give me that Bs that we don’t have a qb, look at the giants who play in the toughest division, no qb, no WRs. 49ers are down to their 3rd sting qb and still win.

So you're upset that the team rallied around him, played hard, and gave panthers fans some meaningful football this late in the season to watch?

Happy Excuse Me GIF

 

Edited by glenwo2
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, glenwo2 said:

So you're upset that the team rallied around him, played hard, and gave panthers fans some meaningful football this late in the season to watch?

/cdn-cgi/mirage/fca5f8343d5e151eec9f086213a99e9631041342c38fd104d3f1df356d4f8a92/1280/https://media0.giphy.com/media/3ELtfmA4Apkju/200.gif

 

Yes! Meaningful? Please at best we would have been a 7-9 team. If we made the playoffs it wouldn’t had been because we were good, it would be because the bucs sucked. We beat some .500 and below teams, good job. You act like we were playing great much watch football during that time. We wasn’t it was boring, bad football.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rmoneyg35 said:

Yes! Meaningful? Please at best we would have been a 7-9 team. If we made the playoffs it wouldn’t had been because we were good, it would be because the bucs sucked. We beat some .500 and below teams, good job. You act like we were playing great much watch football during that time. We wasn’t it was boring, bad football.

Then why were you still watching all this time?

Shouldn't you have stopped watching the moment Rhule was fired and the season was lost? 

 

Hell...why were you watching at all then?

Rhule should've been fired a long time ago

 

Edited by glenwo2
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

B*tching about the lousy division and how the Panthers don't deserve this or that is just being plain whiny.

 

It's almost like you hated that the Panthers were somehow "in it" when you would rather they were just playing out the string.

I guess some enjoy the Pointless-ness of lost seasons.   🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...