Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CJ Henderson


BIGH2001
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, poundaway said:

Lets see.  2 years, two breaks. Sat out almost his entire rookie season.   If indeed it becomes three, then will you say its a problem?

Depends on the injury. Despite the narrative you are trying to spin about my position, I haven't been inconsistent whatsoever. His first injury, as I eluded to, was concerning. The last one was unavoidable and would have happened to any player in the league.

So he has one injury in two years that would bring the "injury prone" narrative into consideration and he bounced back from that this season. So if he has another non contact injury next year, sure, I will be alarmed. If he has another unavoidable hulk smash injury next year, then no. I won't call him injury prone based on that because that would be fuging stupid. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

Depends on the injury. Despite the narrative you are trying to spin about my position, I haven't been inconsistent whatsoever. His first injury, as I eluded to, was concerning. The last one was unavoidable and would have happened to any player in the league.

So he has one injury in two years that would bring the "injury prone" narrative into consideration and he bounced back from that this season. So if he has another non contact injury next year, sure, I will be alarmed. If he has another unavoidable hulk smash injury next year, then no. I won't call him injury prone based on that because that would be fuging stupid. 

I didn't say he was "injury prone".    He's just played two years and had two broken bones.  He missed most of his rookie year by breaking his foot backpedaling, a non contact injury. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, falconlynx said:

Who else gave him so much time to throw? We had a pathetic pass rush today outside of a few sacks. 

Actually, it wasn't that bad.  We had more sacks against Brady than most teams.  Brady has only been sacked 19 times this season before this game, we added three more today.  I believe that only Cleveland has gotten to him three times in one game this season.   

Our secondary was horrific.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Henderson is awful. You should never entertain making a move for a player a year removed from being a top 10 pick that a team is willing to part with. That's as big as red flags get. The two recent ones that come to mind are Henderson and Josh Rosen. Yeah, you gotta be absolutely hopeless for a team to cut bait on you a year after making you a top 10 pick.

Our CB depth is just flat out bad and D-Jax bouncing back from an Achilles might be a long shot. CB is a big need.

 

If it hadn't been for Urban Meyer I'd completely agree. He's the only coach worse than Rhule when that trade was made. Could have been an Elflein and Bozeman situation in Jax or he just sucked. Hard to know which when your coach is too busy being an asshole to coach football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I saw an interesting point the other day about our type of situation.  It could have been wise to hold him off for 1-2 weeks, but that would not have anything to do with Bryce and you could easily communicate that from a PR standpoint.   Why? Well, we just brought an entirely new staff into town, new offense for the returning OL, and had wholesale turnover elsewhere.  So just run Dalton out there the first game or so to see how things are shaking out.  Dry run to make sure we won't kill the kid.  We weren't eyeing the SB.  Get a sense of the line, the receivers, the playbook.  It gives you a glimpse of what Bryce would be stepping into and a good barometer on where things stood sans him.  I suppose we sort of did that with Dalton, but that was a reactive switch and like @Ricky Spanish mentioned, it was against an injured SEA defense where we threw a ridiculous amount.  Who knows, maybe we could have at least won a game or two more that way.  You can adjustments prior to Bryce stepping in, better tee it up for him, and maybe we end up winning game 1 or 2. Last year was such a sh*tshow.  One of the worst seasons I've ever experienced in any sport for any team.  Absolutely nothing made sense together.  Happy we cut the cord early, but should have never hired that crew in the first place.   
    • Johnson is gonna want $20M+ next year. That's why they should have drafted Ladd.
    • It's like folk didn't even watch the game. Dalton took a beating, and barely avoided a lot more violent hits. No 35 years old QB is going to survive a season like that. Imagine him against Dallas or Houston or Indy or Detroit or New Orleans twice! He played better than Bryce in that 1 game, but he wouldn't have lasted half the season. 
×
×
  • Create New...