Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Barnwell: Ranking NFL's best potential head coach openings for 2023

UNCrules2187

By UNCrules2187,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

glenwo2 Grand Master

glenwo2

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, onmyown said:

People, like 75% of the huddle, were saying this last year too, and that Darnold was the issue, and the oline was fine.

This year it could’ve been true.

But I’d add we just need another dline playmaker.

This team loves to give opposing QBs all day long and that will get you destroyed in the playoffs.

Sam was an issue but the oline was definitely not fine last season.   WTF, man?  😂

If anything, the oline is eons better this season than it was last (Bozeman has been a revelation).

And as far as dline playmakers go, yeah I agree.

But how about we have a Head Coach that won't make STUPID DECISIONS on Defense to prevent long-bombs for TDs being thrown?

How about Jaycee Horn try to stay healthy for entire season...FOR A CHANGE?

 

 

Edited by glenwo2
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

Which is why the time is now to go get your guy

At some point all these guys are going to need to be paid. Burns is up now. Brown next. 

Go out and get your QB this offseason while you still have 4 seasons of Ekwonu’s rookie deal left

5 year rookie QB contract + 4 years left on a rookie LT contract… that puts you in a fantastic spot. Add in the fact we have a good OL and other important positions covered… those are reasons for optimism 

Kiper just said that our young guy is going to be Tanner McKee at pick 8….

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, ECHornet said:

That's just not what the data shows at all.

Of the 5 coaches who showed the worst improvement in winning percentage from pre-to-post interim, 3 of them had top 5 best winning % in future records.

Only 1 coach who showed top 5 best improvement from pre-to-post interim had a top 5 winning % in future records: Jason Garrett. The other four coaches who showed the best improvement ended up in the bottom 6 winning % in future records.

If anything, you might be better off hiring the interim coach who does the worst with his team. 

After a deeper dive I want to modify my earlier thoughts. What the data shows to me is that interim coaches dont win that much. And that there is not a correlation between interim record and later success  Not many interim coaches turned around a team and if they did the future results were mixed. Likewise a few of the successful coaches later on had a poor interim record. So overall interim coaches win at around a .47 win rate in the future. Not great. What if we hire a rookie head coach versus hiring  a previous head coach like Harbaugh? This article only covers year 1 and not subsequent years but this suggests that hiring a rookie coach or a veteran  with a new team results in a winning percentage of .45 that year. And that rookie head coaches have a slightly lower win percentage but are 41% more likely to guide them in the playoffs in their rookie year.  Again there seems to be feast and famine

https://www.the33rdteam.com/category/breakdowns/deep-dive-evaluating-success-rate-for-first-year-head-coaches/

One conclusion is that it takes time to turn around a team and whoever the coach is will be lucky to get us to 8-8.  And data on new hires is a mixed bag and not very definitive.  Someone may have more data about subsequent years winning rate for retreads versus new coaches. I suspect it is situation specific with limited generalizability (if that is a word).

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthercougar68 Grand Master

Panthercougar68

Posted
Posted (edited)
53 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Oh I’ve seen a bunch, I’m just leaning into how off the wall that mock was from Kiper.

Kiper saying that means 100 percent it won’t be Tanner lol

Remember the 1st round TE he kept mocking us year after year for a long time? Good times

Edited by Panthercougar68
Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, glenwo2 said:

Sam was an issue but the oline was definitely not fine last season.   WTF, man?  😂

If anything, the oline is eons better this season than it was last (Bozeman has been a revelation).

And as far as dline playmakers go, yeah I agree.

But how about we have a Head Coach that won't make STUPID DECISIONS on Defense to prevent long-bombs for TDs being thrown?

How about Jaycee Horn try to stay healthy for entire season...FOR A CHANGE?

 

 

Saying it was actually true this season implies that it was not true last season.

Edited by onmyown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jb2288
      Josina Anderson: Panthers NOT trading Adam Thielen

      By jb2288 · Posted

      I mean I just don't understand the argument. Baker and Sam both have been pro bowl QBs post their time here. And you just said yourself that is due to him having a damn good roster around him and they are well coached. You're even saying the bad baker is still there somewhere, but he is in a good organization with good roster and coaching that they are getting the best out of him. Why does Baker and Sam get all that benefit of the doubt but when it comes to Bryce it must be a BY9 problem, not an org or team problem?  Hell I got a guy below you arguing with me that Chark/Hurst/Mingo sucked because Bryce wouldn't throw them open. It's ridiculous how far the stretch goes. 
    • CRA
      Josina Anderson: Panthers NOT trading Adam Thielen

      By CRA · Posted

      Correct.  It’s really hard to get open in the NFL when opposing defenses gameplan and cheat coverage/routes on all your players because they know your QB can’t make certain throws/plays.   magically no one that comes to Carolina can get open or make plays with the ball in their hands…..it’s like there is one singular common dominator to it all.  BY makes playing defense way too easy.   NFL players are too good to allow one side to cheat coverage and not respect all the potential threats of a route  so you can dial up a great play.  But if corners and safeties just cheat coverage and know X and Y happening on route/threats….getting open gets hard when they just play it one way.  Getting open has a lot to do with the different threats a WR can pose on a given play.  
    • fanpanther
      Josina Anderson: Panthers NOT trading Adam Thielen

      By fanpanther · Posted

      Kinda depends how you look at it both were 3rd round draft pics.  Nico was nothing before stroud and tank came in with stroud.  If both were on the panthers would young have them doing well and starting or would their stats be low.  I really dont know the answer to that.  None of the panthers wrs have left and did well either but personally i feel neither of nico or tank would do much on the panthers.  
×
×
  • Create New...