Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

9th pick set in stone


t96
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'd call the Bears about #2 but I expect the price to be STEEP. You can only make that trade if you're willing to bet your career on that guy being a future HOFer.

I'm for rolling the dice on Anthony Richardson at #9. Yeah, he's boom or bust. So sign Darnold as the backup so you don't have to play him until he's ready. Then you roll him out there and see if he booms or busts. If it's the latter, go get Drake Maye.

Problem is you're calling the Bears about pick number 1 now... 

That expensive pick just got more expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Varking said:

If they draft a QB I’ll delete my forum account. If they don’t, delete yours. 

I don’t care what they do. I’m just speculating if I was a Bears fan. They have sucked for so long and now they have a chance to change it. I’m not discounting trading the pick either. They win either way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Varking said:

It’s because we passed on him they have to make it the right move in their head. 

it's probably more so about actually watching him play for 2 years now and the fact he is an average to above average QB and his team is about to draft #1 overall. but yeah keep on 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Wanderlai said:

I don’t care what they do. I’m just speculating if I was a Bears fan. They have sucked for so long and now they have a chance to change it. I’m not discounting trading the pick either. They win either way. 

Ahh so you are just throwing poo at the wall without checking in with what experts, the beat writers or the majority of their fans think. Got it. So no friendly bet?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jb2288 said:

it's probably more so about actually watching him play for 2 years now and the fact he is an average to above average QB and his team is about to draft #1 overall. but yeah keep on 

His team is drafting first overall because the roster needs a lot of talent. Even when he was putting up 30+ points a game they lost because their defense gave up 35+. So much for “watching him play” folks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • XL could easily be the last dog at the bowl for WR production next year.  That could leave him around 200-300 yards which would be disastrous.
    • Well sure, that's where the disconnect is then. If Thielen only gets 300-400 yards and T-Mac is healthy for the full season, then I'm with you guys, in that scenario there is absolutely zero excuse for him to not put up over 1,000 yards.   In fact, I'll let you double that, if Thielen has only 600 yards, then again, my expectations are for T-Mac to surpass the 1k mark with ease. But his game has never been about his physical abilities, so even if he loses a half a step, he's still the same player who is a savvy route runner who will get open and Bryce will continue to find him due to their chemistry.  Particularly since Bryce isn't a QB who forces things, he takes what the defense gives him.  So when teams focus on T-Mac and Thielen is more free to find those holes in the defense than he has the last two years, I don't think Bryce is going to ignore him. If someone wants to argue for T-Mac getting to 1,000 yards, personally, I'd say those yards would be far more likelier to come from XL and Coker than Thielen.  And that has nothing to do with XL or Coker, but that I'm still a firm believer in Thielen being able to still get 50-60 yards a game, again, particularly as he'll have less defensive attention on him than in either of his 2 seasons with us so far. Just because T-Mac is our #1 of the future who will have the ball forced to him at times, doesn't mean he needs to be forced into that role from day 1 when we have 3 very legitimate WR options next to him. Let the rookie grow into the role and the NFL game, we have that ability to do so because of Thielen, XL, and Coker.
    • Spot on. He's only 20 and his height 6'2 and weight 230lbs might make him more of an off-ball LB possibility. He's a multi-year project
×
×
  • Create New...