Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

9th pick set in stone


t96
 Share

Recommended Posts

This is the correct order sorry guys

 

  1. Chicago Bears, 3-14
  2. Houston Texans, 3-13-1
  3. Seattle Seahawks (via Denver Broncos, 4-12)
  4. Arizona Cardinals, 4-12
  5. Indianapolis Colts, 4-12-1
  6. Detroit Lions (via Los Angeles Rams, 5-11)
  7. Las Vegas Raiders, 6-11
  8. Atlanta Falcons, 7-10
  9. Carolina Panthers, 7-10
  10. Philadelphia Eagles (via New Orleans Saints, 7-10)
  11. Tennessee Titans, 7-11
  12. Houston Texans (via Cleveland Browns, 7-10)
  13. New York Jets, 7-10
  14. Washington Commanders, 7-8-1
  15. New England Patriots, 8-9
  16. Green Bay Packers, 8-8
  17. Detroit Lions, 8-8
  18. Pittsburgh Steelers, 9-8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DamnItJake! said:

Sounds like a 4th or 5th round draft pick not 1st!! 

Unique physical specimen to be sure, but is SUPER green. Big, fast and strong arm---that's all the Huddle needs.  Production is simply an nuisance that is an inconvenience to their man-crush.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, rebelrouser said:

Tankathon has us at 9.  Didn't our staff think of Corral as a first round talent? I would rather see us trade back and take the best available te,wr, edge, or lb. We could get a qb with the added draft picks.  Anthony Richardson isn't turning into Josh Allen.

I don’t think they saw him as a 1st rounder. They wouldn’t have waited until halfway through the 3rd to draft a 1st round QB.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

How?  How will the qb position work itself out?  fuging a we have tried that 3 years now.   It doesn’t work like that.  

I said with a good team and HC. Not Rhule and whatever we marched out there calling it an o-line. Maybe add a WR or TE and a coach with a clue of offense and that will be a better approach than reaching for a QB that'll need 2 or 3 seasons before looking like a pro.

SF has Mr. Friggin Irrelevant out there winning division games because they've focused on improving the team. That and a HC that has a clue of offense.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Unique physical specimen to be sure, but is SUPER green. Big, fast and strong arm---that's all the Huddle needs.  Production is simply a nuisance that is an inconvenience to their man-crush.

My friend is a Gators fanatic and he said he was definitely not NFL ready and too green as you said.. he was like I hope you guys don’t draft him in the first round.. he’s not worth it.. maybe a later round risk 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tepper wants a quarterback, bad. He saw how the team missed out on Herbet, when Hurney was denied the go-ahead trade with the Giants — rumor. He reportedly wanted to trade up for Burrow as well. Then there's the talk about Tepper also wanting Fields but being denied again. Then we have the well reported off-season where the Panthers tried trading the farm for Watson.

I cannot imagine a scenario where Tepper goes another year being denied a quarterback.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

Tepper wants a quarterback, bad. He saw how the team missed out on Herbet, when Hurney was denied the go-ahead trade with the Giants — rumor. He reportedly wanted to trade up for Burrow as well. Then there's the talk about Tepper also wanting Fields but being denied again. Then we have the well reported off-season where the Panthers tried trading the farm for Watson.

I cannot imagine a scenario where Tepper goes another year being denied a quarterback.

If Tepper sees a QB in the draft he wants, I think he'll do whatever it takes to get it and not be denied this time.

I only hope he doesn't pick the wrong one.    (yeah wishful thinking I know)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Unique physical specimen to be sure, but is SUPER green. Big, fast and strong arm---that's all the Huddle needs.  Production is simply a nuisance that is an inconvenience to their man-crush.

Aren’t you a fan of drafting a TE? How much production do you think a rookie TE will have next year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

Tepper wants a quarterback, bad. He saw how the team missed out on Herbet, when Hurney was denied the go-ahead trade with the Giants — rumor. He reportedly wanted to trade up for Burrow as well. Then there's the talk about Tepper also wanting Fields but being denied again. Then we have the well reported off-season where the Panthers tried trading the farm for Watson.

I cannot imagine a scenario where Tepper goes another year being denied a quarterback.

Same. Which is why I was very pro tanking this year to limit what we need to trade 

I’d do this in a heartbeat btw

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is saying we don't need it, just that we have bigger needs elsewhere, and that type of WR is actually something that is often found in the mid rounds, you just have to scout and evaluate properly. Here's another way of looking at why WR in the 1st shouldn't even be considered an option. Looking only at players currently on the team, what position group would you feel strongest about 4 years from now? I'm not sure there is a better answer there than WR, as you have to think T-Mac is our best player on the team in 4 years (Brown is the only current player I think there is even an argument to be made over T-Mac there), with Coker not far behind. Our OL is too old to be considered, my opinions on Bryce is well known, Hubbard will be done by then and the rest of the RB is an unknown, Off-ball LB is maybe our biggest need, we only have 1 legit safety, it's certainly not TE, and our 2nd best CB right now will be 33 by then.   Brown should still be a beast as he'll only be 31, but nobody else on the DL projects to be that good in 4 years.  Edge rusher with Phillips, Scourton, and Princely is probably the only other possible answer than WR. So yes, that fast/shifty type of WR is 100% a need of ours, but we have so many other bigger needs both in the immediate and future, that to me, taking a WR in the 1st for the 3rd year in a row and having hit on another WR in the same time frame, just makes zero sense both currently and looking into the future.
    • Laughing at Slayton (Mooney or Calvin Austin III), but telling me that Coker is the next best thing since sliced bread...You laughing at Theo Johnson in reference to our guys too? LOL No one in their right mind thinks Nabers is anything but a stud (definitely top 10 if not 5 potential). You do realize that Thomas was in a new system with a furst-time coach last year (with a questionable QB to boot)? And yet still, it's possible that he eclipses even T-mac (not saying that he will). They didn't even mention Travis Hunter. In any event, we're not in the top half. Draft another legit receiver, and we will be. 
    • Absolutely, very fair assessment of the team. 
×
×
  • Create New...