Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching interview updates

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

philit99 Mentor

philit99

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, methodtoll said:

You know what I find strange about this whole process? Not one single request has been put out to Brian Callahan and yet, the Bengals are on the verge of making it to their second straight AFC title game.

I’m pretty sure Indy has interviewed Brian Callahan. I would love for us to speak to him, but I think we may have enough candidates, at about 13-14 or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TLGPanthersFan Grand Master

TLGPanthersFan

Posted
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

I never said to hire Wilks. I said that you couldn't hire them over Wilks. 

 

Which means they out of the running.  

 

Historically an owner will over commit if the past hire was really bad. 

 

Rhule was unproven with no HC experience,  the next HC for the Panthers will have HC experience Historically speaking.  

 

So it's Wilks, Payton or Reich basically.  

I don’t agree with that but whatever. Hiring Wilks because he has past coaching experience is not smart. 
If Tepper wants to win in this league today he hires an OC regardless how these games turned out. Including Kefka. I’d take him over Wilks in a heartbeat. 
I wasn’t discouraged of Kefka because of how the offense played against one of the best defenses in the NFL. 
Giants were very limited. I look at the entire season and what he did with a very bad offense. 
Nah, Kafka should still be in the running and saying he shouldn’t because of yesterday is such a knee jerk reaction. 

Edited by TLGPanthersFan
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

I don’t agree with that but whatever. Hiring Wilks because he has past coaching experience is not smart. 
If Tepper wants to win in this league today he hires an OC regardless how these games turned out. Including Kefka. I’d take him over Wilks in a heartbeat. 
I wasn’t discouraged of Kefka because of how the offense played against one of the best defenses in the NFL. 
Giants were very limited. I look at the entire season and what he did with a very bad offense. 
Nah, Kafka should still be in the running and saying he shouldn’t because of yesterday is such a knee jerk reaction. 

I never said that was my opinion,  I'm stating a fact on what NFL owners do, they generally will go from one extreme to another.  Previous coach had no hc experience,  so the next one will. 

 

Why I think Payton ends up the coach. He's the best of both for Tepper. He's an offensive minded coach who's also a proven head coach in the NFL. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

If that was Dorsey failing his interview and his offense produced 325 against a good Bengals team in snow and wind, what does that mean for Kafka and his 227 yards against the Eagles. 

 

 

It's about context.

The Giants have massively overperformed the talent on their roster this year - they just came up against perhaps the most stacked roster in the NFL.

The Bills, however, are very much in their SuperBowl window and got blown out at home. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lurk21 Mentor

Lurk21

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

I never said that was my opinion,  I'm stating a fact on what NFL owners do, they generally will go from one extreme to another.  Previous coach had no hc experience,  so the next one will. 

 

Why I think Payton ends up the coach. He's the best of both for Tepper. He's an offensive minded coach who's also a proven head coach in the NFL. 

I'm watching him during the post and breaks in the games and  I'm pretty sure he sees that the AFC is a murderers  row of Qbs n teams. The NFC has basically  Hurts, Overrated  Dak and  a bunch of guys. I'm pretty sure he'd rather come to the NFC.  It's just the whole Compensation  that has to not be ridiculous.  Shane has another great game plan  and things get really interesting  if we haven't made the hire before then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Navy_football
      Alejandro Avila: Are We Really About To Hand Offensive Rookie Of The Year To An 'Okay' Receiver?

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Adam Thielen had 1000 yards with rookie Bryce. I guess he's using that as comparison. Just kidding. Calm down. 
    • kungfoodude
      Someone's not gonna be happy

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      We definitely improved from 2024 to 2025, to me the results were less important than the roster in that regard. It's better. It's still a very bad roster but continuing to be better is the goal. The changes we are talking about at QB are about spending LESS resources. Not picking up Bryce's 5th is a big potential savings. Significantly better QB's have been had in recent years for half or less than what Bryce will get in 2026. To say nothing of an extension(the ridiculous subject of this thread) which would cripple roster building by saddling it with a bloated QB contract for an awful QB. The price for Bryce, I mean who is even making that argument anymore? I don't think you are seeing anyone in this thread discussing trading up to #1 for Mendoza.  We are talking about cheap backup and FA QB's and Day 2 and 3 draft guys. That is literally tied to the idea of roster building. IMPROVE at QB while you build the roster so that we can actually potentially attract a franchise QB or when you make that big move up(SF for Lance) that your roster is so good that the impact is largely negated.  After all, improving over Bryce is an extremely low bar to hit. Let's not assume that standing pat would have resulted in a sudden spurge in good decision making. Don't forget who was making all those roster calls at the time. Bryce or not, we would have fuged it up in some way because we had idiots at the helm. We may still yet. Also, it's easy to say we can't get in the habit of switching QB's like that but there are also plenty of situations where that flip was the correct decision. Richardson to Jones, Rosen to Murray, Fields to Williams, Lance to Purdy(technically some nuance to this), etc. There is no real danger of Bryce leaving and suddenly becoming an elite QB. We all do know this, no matter how big of a Bryce stan you may be. His ceiling is middling game manager. So there isn't some crazy risk of moving on.
    • Navy_football
      Someone's not gonna be happy

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Honestly. You can see it on the field. Bryce will literally skip a pass on the ground rather than throw a contested catch to XL. Especially when it's one where XL would have to fight back to the ball. Coker is actually really good at that. Coker lacks real NFL speed (not a small thing), but he maxes out in most other categories. 
×
×
  • Create New...