Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching interview updates

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TLGPanthersFan Grand Master

TLGPanthersFan

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

Not an odd take at all. I agree with you. 

It seems our owner wants a more progressive, offense-oriented head coach. That's not Wilks. If our owner stood up for Wilks and made sure he was given the DC role, that would indicate he is valued by the organization. It is still a promotion from where he started the year.

Now, if we choose a defensive-minded coach over Wilks, I'd consider leaving "the room flipping a double bird" if I were him. 

Now what if the Ryan is like McDermott. Able to consistently build a good offensive staff while also being able to concentrate and build a good defensive staff that is his bread and butter. 
All we have on Wilks is that one year in Arizona and both his offensive and defensive staff was terrible. 
Now I now that Wilks, allegedly, didn’t get to choose his OC, but his DC was Holcomb and the Arizona defense was just so, so bad. 
I say all that to say this. Ryan maybe able to build a good staff. While Wilks is batting 0-1 on building a good staff. 
It is all speculation it I’d rather give Ryan a chance over Wilks. Because I think Ryan will likely be more modern and Wilks will just be old fashioned and conservative. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TLGPanthersFan Grand Master

TLGPanthersFan

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

If they are going to move away from Steve, move away

last thing needed here is buddy Ryan and Mike dikta situation 

not saying  Wilks would not do that but players might 

if they want defense go Demeco

i love Wilks but some things in the Tampa game really bothered me…a game they had everything to gain and nothing to lose 

I think the final 3 will be Johnson, Steichen and Kafka, personally. 
 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jamos14 Experienced

jamos14

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Now what if the Ryan is like McDermott. Able to consistently build a good offensive staff while also being able to concentrate and build a good defensive staff that is his bread and butter. 
All we have on Wilks is that one year in Arizona and both his offensive and defensive staff was terrible. 
Now I now that Wilks, allegedly, didn’t get to choose his OC, but his DC was Holcomb and the Arizona defense was just so, so bad. 
I say all that to say this. Ryan maybe able to build a good staff. While Wilks is batting 0-1 on building a good staff. 
It is all speculation it I’d rather give Ryan a chance over Wilks. Because I think Ryan will likely be more modern and Wilks will just be old fashioned and conservative. 

There is a reason Wilks was coaching at Missouri.   His defenses have not been good.  His D at Missouri was TERRIBLE and got better the year he left.   He's a motivator and tough guy.  Good man.  

He is not a top tier NFL coach and the rest of the league knows that.  Also why he doesn't have ANY other interviews.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted

The Athletic's Joe Person reports that the Panthers have requested permission to interview 49ers DC DeMeco Ryans for their head coaching vacancy.

That makes a three-team card for Ryans as the Broncos and Texans have also requested permission to interview him. San Francisco's defensive coordinator has led the team to a No. 1 defensive DVOA finish this season and would likely pair with a Kyle Shanahan Tree offensive coordinator if he gets a head coach gig. Ryans would have been a good coaching candidate before this season happened. Now he's perhaps one of the best out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
trueblade Grand Master

trueblade

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

The Athletic's Joe Person reports that the Panthers have requested permission to interview 49ers DC DeMeco Ryans for their head coaching vacancy.

That makes a three-team card for Ryans as the Broncos and Texans have also requested permission to interview him. San Francisco's defensive coordinator has led the team to a No. 1 defensive DVOA finish this season and would likely pair with a Kyle Shanahan Tree offensive coordinator if he gets a head coach gig. Ryans would have been a good coaching candidate before this season happened. Now he's perhaps one of the best out there.

Someone has to explain to me why Ryans will have more success than Saleh has up to this point.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...