Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching interview updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

lol the fact that he puts it in parenthesis counters his own point

It was unimportant. They couldn’t win any grudge match or meaningful game they played. They lost every time. They padded with their record against patsies and never came through when it counted.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Growl said:

lol the fact that he puts it in parenthesis counters his own point

It was unimportant. They couldn’t win any grudge match or meaningful game they played. They lost every time. They padded with their record against patsies and never came through when it counted.

Yep and by winning over the locker room he means allowing vets to get extensions they haven’t earned while having no real expectations of playing meaningful ball. The locker room needs to worry about winning over the new HC. Not the other way around. 

Edited by RJK
  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Growl said:

lol the fact that he puts it in parenthesis counters his own point

It was unimportant. They couldn’t win any grudge match or meaningful game they played. They lost every time. They padded with their record against patsies and never came through when it counted.

Seattle didn’t count ?
Detroit didn’t count ?

Tampa didn’t count ?

I get you don’t like Wilks and that’s ok but give him his due. The previous coach had a $64 million contract and left a trail of poo miles long 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

That is true. If Wilks has not done enough to get a fair shot here after what he's been able to do for this organization I doubt he will get one anywhere. I've always been a pretty staunch critic of Wilks defensive approach.  So I have mixed feelings about him as head coach. But I do not own the team. If I did I would give him a shot on morality alone. I would not give 2 $hits what the fans think. This entire situation just leaves a bad taste in my mouth. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m over “caring” about the HC feel good stories. Heck I’m sick of moral wins. I want this team to put winning first above everything else! I get the feel goods, but it feels better to beat the other team by 40 & then put your foot on their throats and punch them in their face one more time!! I want to have a HC & team mindset that is we plan to beat you even when you’re down! Who is THAT HC?? 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Former Broncos coach Vic Fangio could be in play as a defensive boss if Johnson is the choice as a potential successor to the fired Lovie Smith.

I’m not sure what the connection is but yes please.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

That is true. If Wilks has not done enough to get a fair shot here after what he's been able to do for this organization I doubt he will get one anywhere. I've always been a pretty staunch critic of Wilks defensive approach.  So I have mixed feelings about him as head coach. But I do not own the team. If I did I would give him a shot on morality alone. I would not give 2 $hits what the fans think. This entire situation just leaves a bad taste in my mouth. 

It would stink to have to cut Wilks loose. I am very torn. I could be convinced to keep Wilks and pair him with stud coordinators. However, the thought of a fresh offensively-minded HC is exciting. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...