Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching interview updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

lol the fact that he puts it in parenthesis counters his own point

It was unimportant. They couldn’t win any grudge match or meaningful game they played. They lost every time. They padded with their record against patsies and never came through when it counted.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Growl said:

lol the fact that he puts it in parenthesis counters his own point

It was unimportant. They couldn’t win any grudge match or meaningful game they played. They lost every time. They padded with their record against patsies and never came through when it counted.

Yep and by winning over the locker room he means allowing vets to get extensions they haven’t earned while having no real expectations of playing meaningful ball. The locker room needs to worry about winning over the new HC. Not the other way around. 

Edited by RJK
  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Growl said:

lol the fact that he puts it in parenthesis counters his own point

It was unimportant. They couldn’t win any grudge match or meaningful game they played. They lost every time. They padded with their record against patsies and never came through when it counted.

Seattle didn’t count ?
Detroit didn’t count ?

Tampa didn’t count ?

I get you don’t like Wilks and that’s ok but give him his due. The previous coach had a $64 million contract and left a trail of poo miles long 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

That is true. If Wilks has not done enough to get a fair shot here after what he's been able to do for this organization I doubt he will get one anywhere. I've always been a pretty staunch critic of Wilks defensive approach.  So I have mixed feelings about him as head coach. But I do not own the team. If I did I would give him a shot on morality alone. I would not give 2 $hits what the fans think. This entire situation just leaves a bad taste in my mouth. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m over “caring” about the HC feel good stories. Heck I’m sick of moral wins. I want this team to put winning first above everything else! I get the feel goods, but it feels better to beat the other team by 40 & then put your foot on their throats and punch them in their face one more time!! I want to have a HC & team mindset that is we plan to beat you even when you’re down! Who is THAT HC?? 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Former Broncos coach Vic Fangio could be in play as a defensive boss if Johnson is the choice as a potential successor to the fired Lovie Smith.

I’m not sure what the connection is but yes please.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

That is true. If Wilks has not done enough to get a fair shot here after what he's been able to do for this organization I doubt he will get one anywhere. I've always been a pretty staunch critic of Wilks defensive approach.  So I have mixed feelings about him as head coach. But I do not own the team. If I did I would give him a shot on morality alone. I would not give 2 $hits what the fans think. This entire situation just leaves a bad taste in my mouth. 

It would stink to have to cut Wilks loose. I am very torn. I could be convinced to keep Wilks and pair him with stud coordinators. However, the thought of a fresh offensively-minded HC is exciting. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They had best show out in Week 1 there are zero,I mean zero,  excuses for that offense  defense, haven’t play together yet and they still have Mr Soft and Predictable as DC  I expect break downs at times  …but that offense returns all starters except Tremble and both Mayes and Brady are veterans and can play LG and know the system not up for any participation awards this season they can save that practice energy for Jacksonville.     I’m sick of the, winning,  or looking competitive, when it doesn’t matter.   
    • There are some tough decisions that I'm eager to see the results of... Does Blackshear sneak on to the roster as RB4? Does the team go with 4 TEs or just 3 again? And has Mitchell Evans done enough to defend his roster spot from James Mitchell? Who is WR6 and is there a WR7? TMac, XL, Coker, and AT seem to be locks imo and I'm assuming Renfrow also makes it due to all of the camp praise. Who makes it between Brycen Tremayne, Jimmy Horn Jr, and David Moore? If the team goes with 7 WRs, which one of those three doesn't make it? Jacolby George and Emani Bailey both have not gotten a lot of game time. Could the Panthers be trying to hide them so that they can be stashed on the PS? Do they go with 10 OL instead of 9? Who makes it out of Walton, Carter, and Kingston? DL locks are DB, BB3, ARob, and Turk. That leaves Jaden Crumedy, Cam Jackson, Sam Roberts, Shy Tuttle, and LaBryan Ray all competing for the final 1 - 3 spots. Does DJ Johnson get IR'd and Thomas Incoom make the roster as EDGE5? What in the fuuuuuuuuuuuuck is going to happen at LB? Only locks are Wallace, Rozeboom, and Cherelus (Wallace has mentioned in media how Cherelus has been big bro for him on the team) seem to be locks. Rhattigan had some good moments against Houston, Martin-Scott is an SC guy, Krys Barnes has popped on defense and on special teams, and Windmon got time starting for the team last season. Are two of those guys going to make it or are the Panthers poaching from another team's cuts? CB5... who is it? Do they go with the 4 expected safeties or bring in a 5th? Has Ransom done enough to take the start from Nick Scott?
    • I had this discussion with my buddy yesterday afternoon. If we start this season very slow(especially with the schedule being what it is) and then "rally" in the second half to get to 4-7 wins, I am already gonna be pretty heated at the staff overall. I know we are a very bad roster but I am not gonna keep excusing these slow season starts WITH late season rallies. That's a coaching staff problem, IMO. It's more excusable to just stink gate to gate, IMO. At least you can understand why.
×
×
  • Create New...