Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you want to get the #1 pick from the Bears, what's your move?

EgoDogg

By EgoDogg,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Aussie Tank Grand Master

Aussie Tank

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Teddy had his best play here. Darnold had his best play here. Mayfield was the only one who didn't. DJ has put up good stats despite trash at QB. It baffles me how much of this fanbase doesn't comprehend this.

 

Teddy played better in NO and Sams bar wasn’t very high. Moore is not a game changing WR so he is definitely expendable for a franchise QB 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

Teddy played better in NO and Sams bar wasn’t very high. Moore is not a game changing WR so he is definitely expendable for a franchise QB 

Teddy played six games in N.O. He had his best sustained play here.

Go ahead and trade DJ but I'll tell you how it ends. It ends in howling and crying about how our new franchise QB has nothing but trash to throw to and we're stunting his development. And the howling and crying would be correct, but a lot of the same folks doing the crying and howling would be the same folks who thought DJ was a JAG and easily replaced. He's not. Fans of this fanbase should more than realize that good receivers don't just grow on trees. We've had very few of them.

 

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Krovvy Grand Master

Krovvy

Posted
Posted
Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Teddy played six games in N.O. He had his best sustained play here.

Go ahead and trade DJ but I'll tell you how it ends. It ends in howling and crying about how our new franchise QB has nothing but trash to throw to and we're stunting his development. And the howling and crying would be correct, but a lot of the same folks doing the crying and howling would be the same folks who thought DJ was a JAG and easily replaced. He's not. Fans of this fanbase should more than realize that good receivers don't just grow on trees. We've had very few of them.

 

I don't think this about people wanting to trade D.J. Moore, but about what Chicago will want.

I personally would much rather go back to the Cam days of having terrible receivers, but a great (potentially) quarterback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aussie Tank Grand Master

Aussie Tank

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Teddy played six games in N.O. He had his best sustained play here.

Go ahead and trade DJ but I'll tell you how it ends. It ends in howling and crying about how our new franchise QB has nothing but trash to throw to and we're stunting his development. And the howling and crying would be correct, but a lot of the same folks doing the crying and howling would be the same folks who thought DJ was a JAG and easily replaced. He's not. Fans of this fanbase should more than realize that good receivers don't just grow on trees. We've had very few of them.

 

WR are coming out in droves putting up 1000 yard seasons as rookies if I can add Moore to get our QB I’m doing it all day

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rebelrouser Mentor

rebelrouser

Posted
Posted

Trading into spot for Young or Stroud would be too expensive, Levis could fall to 9 anyway (seeing this more and more in mocks), and no way in hell you give anything away to go after AR.  I would take Levis at 9 (25% chance) or AR with our first second round pick (10% or less chance).    

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brooklyn 3.0 Grand Master

Brooklyn 3.0

Posted
Posted (edited)

This place is bananas. We had the PERFECT chance to have the resources to trade up with little harm to our future ... but we didn't do it. Instead, we traded away our best player for peanuts. We also had the perfect chance to just let things fall as the may and we could have drafted at the top of the pile and had to give up nothing. But now? Now some of you actually want to trade away future for a top pick?

Idiot Facepalm GIF

Edited by Brooklyn 3.0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...