Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper clearly wants to change the Panthers identity


Saca312
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Varking said:

The Bengals loss and even the win vs the Saints to end the year. Can anyone claim that was good coaching? We looked worse in those two games than the 4 or 5 this year that Rhule coached. And thats the scary part of Wilks. The lows were actually lower than what Rhule did this year. And we acknowledge he was a bum. 

Damn, I didn't even consider this and I didn't want Wilks to begin with. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

The players want to play for Wilks!

Also the players, let’s let a Trubisky led Steelers team walk the ball right down our throats for 3 hours 

The division tried gifting us a playoff spot but Wilks and co. let Brady and Evans absolutely torch us

Wilks and these guys had their chance and they didn’t do anything with it. Why in the hell would anyone want more of this?

And those guys, the core will remember that...

They fought hard no matter the win/losses...this team was dysfunctional for 3 years, and Wilks had one game to win to make the playoffs with them. 

If you give Wilks a team and tell him he has no say what so ever and he takes them to 3-13

Now you tell Wilks to take a team that's already been set in stone without his help he gets them to 6-6

How would a Wilks take over look like?

To me damn the coach if the QB sucks...so if Wilks sees his Josh Allen let it be for the love of god

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GuessWhosBack said:

And those guys, the core will remember that...

Well the Tampa loss came soon after the “protect the bank” week loss against Pittsburgh

Didn’t seem like they remembered much. 

And core pieces like Burns and Brown who have been most vocal about Wilks showed up the least in Tampa

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was Tepper:

just hire Wilks(moral), start searching for an OC(entertainment), hire Lovie Smith as DC(SB experience defense) , get the Bears #2 pick  or whatever it takes to draft our QB(Young)(Franchise Player)...and go into training camp...let the rest play out how it may...

Stop trying to outsmart myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, GuessWhosBack said:

He was set up to fail...Kliff n Murray...

But he learned from that...hence the full control he said he wanted from go in his last interview when asked what he learned from his time in AZ

 

He said the Head Coach...not Gm..not owner..but Head Coach sets the tone for the BUILDING

Talk. All that is. Heard enough of that when Rivera was head coach. Wilks losses this year proved he didn’t learn. 
 

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Well the Tampa loss came soon after the “protect the bank” week loss against Pittsburgh

Didn’t seem like they remembered much. 

And core pieces like Burns and Brown who have been most vocal about Wilks showed up the least in Tampa

And even against the Saints, we were bailed out by Sam fuging Darnold turning into Sam Newton and, after completing like one total pass, throwing a dart to move us into FG position. Admittedly Burns wasn't playing but our team looked dead...

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Varking said:

I hear your argument but can you show me some examples of folks who took over on an interim basis and then coached the team better in year two?

If I do then that is the exception, right. The problem is that history doesn't always predict success especially when you go from the macro to the individual case. The best indicator of his success is to project the amount of improvement he made and assume he will continue to do so. Aren't we assuming that if we bring in a new head coach with no experience that he will improve over time even though we have plenty of examples where that wasn't always the case like Rhule.  So using that logic we wouldn't bring in anybody 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, GuessWhosBack said:

If I was Tepper:

just hire Wilks(moral), start searching for an OC(entertainment), hire Lovie Smith as DC(SB experience defense) , get the Bears #2 pick  or whatever it takes to draft our QB(Young)(Franchise Player)...and go into training camp...let the rest play out how it may...

Stop trying to outsmart myself.

Thank god you are not the owner. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Varking said:

This was not Wilks rookie year. He went 3-13 in Arizona where he coached the team to a worse offense and defense than the year prior so they fired him after giving him a four year deal. 

Then call him a first year coach with this franchise.  I don't know anyone still saying he got a fair shot at Arizona or using it as justification for not hiring him this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Well the Tampa loss came soon after the “protect the bank” week loss against Pittsburgh

Didn’t seem like they remembered much. 

And core pieces like Burns and Brown who have been most vocal about Wilks showed up the least in Tampa

Burns didn't, as usual.  But Brown was playing his ass off. But one man does not a dline make. I watched him on nearly every down. He was playing his ass off and did in the last game as well. He needs someone other than McCall beside him. Not to discredit McCall but he is limited to 3rd downs. Brown plays until he has to come out for a breather. He needs  some help on the line and his teammates are not stepping up.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love wilks but if you bring him back we know what we’re getting. I don’t have a problem with Tepper hiring someone outside the box like he did with rhule. The problem was holding onto him when it was very obvious after his second year that he sucked.
 

I don’t want Tepper to just go with an average HC because it’s safe. Take some risk, make a splash if doesn’t work out know when to cut and run. I’m looking at Ben Johnson, Kafka and Steichen as the top 3 with Ryan as the fourth. We need to try something new. Get a true offensive mind pair him with a talented qb and see what happens. Just breath some fuging life into this franchise.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...