Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

“I don’t think they draft a QB”


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ncfan said:

Will Kunkle who covers the Panthers just said on WFNZ 

“I don’t think the Panthers draft a QB”  

“They don’t like any of the QBs that are expected to be available.  And do not want to move up for one of these guys.”

 

Can't say this until you AT LEAST have a coach, and OC on the staff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, pantherj said:

An anonymous source told me that we're interested in taking a WR at the 9th pick. "We just don't like the value for a QB at 9." said my anonymous source. No I won't name the source, not even after the draft is over. You'll never know my source.

My anonymous source specifically named your anonymous source and said he was a liar. 

Also said that your breath smelled like stale Cheetos. 

I'll never give up my source. I will never give up @Jeremy Igo

  • Pie 2
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He doesnt, he just said as much in his last presser, he however forgot he traded up for him and supposedly had a first ground grade on him

 

fug fitterer

Yea maybe he wasnt thinking about it but when he said last year was a "nuts and bolts offensive draft" and this draft was going to be more sexy, that doesn't sound like he has a lot of faith in Corral doing much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Lobo said:

Jury is still out on Watson due to small sample size, Wilson is a different story. Il take my chances with an mvp who had no WRs and now (if they get him) would have WRs. 

I'm just not a big fan of the whole "doing what failed for others but this time it'll work" scenario.

Even less so when you consider that it would take a massive haul to get Jackson and he'd want a fully guaranteed contract despite his style of play being possibly more prone to injuries.

That's a little too much of a potential disaster for me.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember when this was supposed to be a really rich QB draft? Well maybe next year or next year or next year or next year?

We know what is gonna happen next year, a supposedly rich QB draft again, then college season will begin and the all of a sudden we will go from a QB rich draft to no one is worth a 1st round pick except  maybe that one guy. Every single year it is the exact same thing. 

We are never gonna solve our QB problem are we? Main reason I can never be excited for us to possibly make the playoffs. Because the person behind center is a continued liability. 

QB purgatory. I hate it.                         

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm just not a big fan of the whole "doing what failed for others but this time it'll work" scenario.

Even less so when you consider that it would take a massive haul to get Jackson and he'd want a fully guaranteed contract despite his style of play being possibly more prone to injuries.

That's a little too much of a potential disaster for me.

So what do you have in mind then, if they don’t draft a qb? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
×
×
  • Create New...