Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

“I don’t think they draft a QB”


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ncfan said:

Will Kunkle who covers the Panthers just said on WFNZ 

“I don’t think the Panthers draft a QB”  

“They don’t like any of the QBs that are expected to be available.  And do not want to move up for one of these guys.”

 

Can't say this until you AT LEAST have a coach, and OC on the staff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, pantherj said:

An anonymous source told me that we're interested in taking a WR at the 9th pick. "We just don't like the value for a QB at 9." said my anonymous source. No I won't name the source, not even after the draft is over. You'll never know my source.

My anonymous source specifically named your anonymous source and said he was a liar. 

Also said that your breath smelled like stale Cheetos. 

I'll never give up my source. I will never give up @Jeremy Igo

  • Pie 2
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He doesnt, he just said as much in his last presser, he however forgot he traded up for him and supposedly had a first ground grade on him

 

fug fitterer

Yea maybe he wasnt thinking about it but when he said last year was a "nuts and bolts offensive draft" and this draft was going to be more sexy, that doesn't sound like he has a lot of faith in Corral doing much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Lobo said:

Jury is still out on Watson due to small sample size, Wilson is a different story. Il take my chances with an mvp who had no WRs and now (if they get him) would have WRs. 

I'm just not a big fan of the whole "doing what failed for others but this time it'll work" scenario.

Even less so when you consider that it would take a massive haul to get Jackson and he'd want a fully guaranteed contract despite his style of play being possibly more prone to injuries.

That's a little too much of a potential disaster for me.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember when this was supposed to be a really rich QB draft? Well maybe next year or next year or next year or next year?

We know what is gonna happen next year, a supposedly rich QB draft again, then college season will begin and the all of a sudden we will go from a QB rich draft to no one is worth a 1st round pick except  maybe that one guy. Every single year it is the exact same thing. 

We are never gonna solve our QB problem are we? Main reason I can never be excited for us to possibly make the playoffs. Because the person behind center is a continued liability. 

QB purgatory. I hate it.                         

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm just not a big fan of the whole "doing what failed for others but this time it'll work" scenario.

Even less so when you consider that it would take a massive haul to get Jackson and he'd want a fully guaranteed contract despite his style of play being possibly more prone to injuries.

That's a little too much of a potential disaster for me.

So what do you have in mind then, if they don’t draft a qb? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...