Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Playoffs


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, OceanPanther said:

Yes , coaching and quarterbacking matters.

trevor Lawrence, with one year of decent coaching is moving toward being that franchise Qb everyone is expecting out of him. 
I don’t expect the Jags to go far, but they won that last game when they had to. Baby steps.  
I wish it was us taking those baby steps with a potential franchise Qb 

If you have a coach and a QB you have the foundation for a contender. Their arrow is definitely pointing straight up.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ladypanther said:

Jags and Niners here.  The Jags are kind of an underdog story which I love.  Purdy...big time underdog story.  Plus, always pulling for CMC.

Did I mention coaching matters?

I can't root for the 49ers. I have an insufferable 49ers fan buddy. I will never hear the end of it.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Peon Awesome said:

This new overtime rules will be an interesting rule change. Seems like it would be advantageous to defer in overtime now. You know you're guaranteed a possession no matter what, so you'll know after the other team's first possession if you need to go for every 4th down if they get a td, or can plan a 2 point conversion to win. Or of course if the other team doesn't score, you know a fg will win it as opposed to starting first and worrying if a fg will be enough. Curious to see how they play it.

I'm not sure - If you defer, you are only guaranteed the ball for one possession to score. If you take the kick, you are guaranteed two possessions or the win as long as you can start with a TD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ECHornet said:

I like CMC too, but don’t see how Panthers fans could root for a 49ers win with so much draft position riding on it for us. 

To this day, why did they trade to the 49ers instead of the Rams 

a helluva lot of list draft position there 

one draft pick difference doesn’t equal that since that 2 looks like a high 3 and so on

a very Panthers thing to do 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, raleigh-panther said:

To this day, why did they trade to the 49ers instead of the Rams 

a helluva lot of list draft position there 

one draft pick difference doesn’t equal that since that 2 looks like a high 3 and so on

a very Panthers thing to do 

I think Christian wanted to go to SF more. Nothing else makes sense. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is saying we don't need it, just that we have bigger needs elsewhere, and that type of WR is actually something that is often found in the mid rounds, you just have to scout and evaluate properly. Here's another way of looking at why WR in the 1st shouldn't even be considered an option. Looking only at players currently on the team, what position group would you feel strongest about 4 years from now? I'm not sure there is a better answer there than WR, as you have to think T-Mac is our best player on the team in 4 years (Brown is the only current player I think there is even an argument to be made over T-Mac there), with Coker not far behind. Our OL is too old to be considered, my opinions on Bryce is well known, Hubbard will be done by then and the rest of the RB is an unknown, Off-ball LB is maybe our biggest need, we only have 1 legit safety, it's certainly not TE, and our 2nd best CB right now will be 33 by then.   Brown should still be a beast as he'll only be 31, but nobody else on the DL projects to be that good in 4 years.  Edge rusher with Phillips, Scourton, and Princely is probably the only other possible answer than WR. So yes, that fast/shifty type of WR is 100% a need of ours, but we have so many other bigger needs both in the immediate and future, that to me, taking a WR in the 1st for the 3rd year in a row and having hit on another WR in the same time frame, just makes zero sense both currently and looking into the future.
    • Laughing at Slayton (Mooney or Calvin Austin III), but telling me that Coker is the next best thing since sliced bread...You laughing at Theo Johnson in reference to our guys too? LOL No one in their right mind thinks Nabers is anything but a stud (definitely top 10 if not 5 potential). You do realize that Thomas was in a new system with a furst-time coach last year (with a questionable QB to boot)? And yet still, it's possible that he eclipses even T-mac (not saying that he will). They didn't even mention Travis Hunter. In any event, we're not in the top half. Draft another legit receiver, and we will be. 
    • Absolutely, very fair assessment of the team. 
×
×
  • Create New...