Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Roman Harper thinks Sean Payton could be our next HC now


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

“Sean Payton will probably blow David Tepper’s mind away,” he said. “And up until yesterday—obviously there’s no way Sean Payton ends up with the Carolina Panthers. No way. But now, I’ve completely changed. I think, if I’m [Saints general manager] Mickey Loomis, I make the trade.”

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2023/01/17/panthers-fans-roman-harper-sean-payton-david-tepper/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather have a fresh face.  I can understand why some would want Payton, but there are several good reasons not to hire him.

  • Character issues (bounty gate, vicodin man, etc).
  • Only 1 Super Bowl with top tier QB play for a long period of time.
  • No head coach has ever won a 2nd Super Bowl with another team.
  • He would cost significant draft capital.
  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Now make it a 59 year old coach that has already won a Super Bowl and enjoyed a nice long career.  There is nothing left to prove.  He could retire in 2-3 years and be content.  

Or in a divisional move to fug the Panthers, we trade away our 24 1st to NO, he coaches 1 year and retires again. Though I'm sure there would be a clause to prevent this, it wouldn't surprise me if it happened. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

Yet he is still there.  It's also a lot less common for a 36 year old coach to retire and go to broadcasting than a 60 year old one.

I still dont think thats an age thing.... its more an end of term or how someone feels. I mean Bruce Arians retired went to broadcasting and came back to win a super bowl. I just cant connect the dots to your logic here on using age to provide a deterent to hire a coach.

Personally I want Johnson, so Im not jumping up and down for SP.  However, the reasons I dont want SP has nothing to do with his age.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, NJPanthers12 said:

I didn’t want Payton, mainly due to the fact we would have to trade assets to get him. But after seeing all these idiots on twitter saying that they will give up their PSLs and wilks is a better option, I hope it’s Payton.

Whine and cheese crowd, looks like they will drop the cheese, and just be whine.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

“Sean Payton will probably blow David Tepper’s mind away,” he said. “And up until yesterday—obviously there’s no way Sean Payton ends up with the Carolina Panthers. No way. But now, I’ve completely changed. I think, if I’m [Saints general manager] Mickey Loomis, I make the trade.”

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2023/01/17/panthers-fans-roman-harper-sean-payton-david-tepper/

If you've been watching his Colin Cowherds weekly segments you know what Roman is taking about. Sean is very impressive very bright individual and a terrific HC

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

“All the negative things that people have said about him, in Carolina, for all these years—the smug looks, the arrogance, the cockiness—they would freakin’ love it here,” he said.

“From the equipment guys to everybody in that organization, they would all be different,” Harper added. “Because they’re not used to what he would be. It’s completely different from what Ron [Rivera] is. It’s completely different from what Foxy [John Fox] was. It’s completely, completely different than what Matt Rhule was.”

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2023/01/17/panthers-fans-roman-harper-sean-payton-david-tepper/

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Or in a divisional move to fug the Panthers, we trade away our 24 1st to NO, he coaches 1 year and retires again. Though I'm sure there would be a clause to prevent this, it wouldn't surprise me if it happened. 

Yall are crying over made up scenarios. We haven't even interviewed the man yet

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I still dont think thats an age thing.... its more an end of term or how someone feels. I mean Bruce Arians retired went to broadcasting and came back to win a super bowl. I just cant connect the dots to your logic here on using age to provide a deterent to hire a coach.

Personally I want Johnson, so Im not jumping up and down for SP.  However, the reasons I dont want SP has nothing to do with his age.

Would you want to bring in Pete Carroll at 70 years old?  Just wondering where your line is or if you have one.

Trading away future assets for an older coach that has already won a Super Bowl just seems a little sort sighted to me.  I just see him wanting to sign vets and go straight into win now mode and screw over the future.  I don't see him developing a young rookie QB, he will probably want Carr or Jackson (trading away more future picks).  If we were just signing one like Reich (similar age) to help turn our franchise around and build stability then for some reason it just sits better with me.

It doesn't help that I am EXTREMELY bias on this because I hate Sean Payton.....

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...