Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers in violation of NFL rules regarding their search for a permanent head coach, multiple sources tell CBS Sports.

SgtJoo

By SgtJoo,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

It’s not an hour. They bring an agency in to coach you and then spend time quizzing you and “certifying” you .
 

Just adding context so people understand that this isn’t some online quiz. It’s a process.

Tepper sent the bill to Rock Hill and when he found out they weren't picking up the tab he was just like, "Well, fug it. We aren't doing that poo then."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KSpan Grand Master

KSpan

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

So she is too lazy or entitled to do the little things, spend an hour of her day, but she is qualified to hire a new head coach? What a train wreck this team is 

Who says she knew and didn't complete it? I'm not saying you're 100% wrong and Tepper has been a total clown to date, but the failure could easily be organizational vs her personally.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

Following a request for comment, a team spokesman said in a statement: "She was trained prior to participating in interviews." No further elaboration was given.

Multiple sources have refuted the Panthers' statement.

lol.  Oh we did “other training”.   What clowns.  Just say you didn’t do it and will get it done.  Tepper sounding like my middle schooler. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, CRA said:

lol.  Oh we did “other training”.   What clowns.  Just say you didn’t do it and will get it done.  Tepper sounding like my middle schooler. 

She could still could be trained in diversity hiring… that’s not a lie. It’s the fact that they didn’t use one of the NFL’s partnered agencies. That’s where the NFL is fining them.

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamTheMan Community Regular

CamTheMan

Posted
Posted

The NFL sucks balls god damn. 
 

2011-2018: The only team with a minority head coach and minority quarterback 

2018: Owner says a no-no word and gets the entire team taken from him

2019: New guy guts the team and replaces the coach and quarterback with white people with no personality 

2019-2022: Team eats poo, new minority head coach as interim

2023: Has a woman as a leading decision maker in the hiring process, but can’t make a hire until we interview enough black people (interim coach doesn’t count cause, yknow, that’d be racist?)

…

Some asshole getting paid a 6-digit salary with the job title “league inclusion officer”: woah woah woah, you didn’t complete your inclusive hiring training bro? u some kinda racist? you have to interview the coaches the way WE tell you to or ELSE!!!

 

At a certain point this has to get demeaning to minorities but this probably isn’t the best place for that discussion heh

  • Pie 8
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

She could still could be trained in diversity hiring… that’s not a lie. It’s the fact that they didn’t use one of the NFL’s partnered agencies. That’s where the NFL is fining them.

lol.  What it is, is just bologna.  They were called out for not doing the league required training.  You either did it or you didn’t.   Issuing a statement that she was in fact trained is politician type BS.   It’s irrelevant to the fact at hand.  

It doesn’t matter if she did other training.  it’s like the league saying you have to pee in a cup for them. You don’t.  When called on it you claim you totally did….at home by yourself and it looked good. 
 

Big deal? Not really.  Not by itself.  But there is a pattern with Tepper at this point.   That’s the point.  We are poorly run in lots of ways. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Captain Morgan
      OTA's

      By Captain Morgan · Posted

      Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • WUnderhill
      Myles Garrett Traded to Rams

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...