Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB needy teams drafting before us


GOAT
 Share

Recommended Posts

There should be some QB's available via trade and free agency this year. Brady, Rodgers, Jones, Jackson, Carr, Tannehill, Garrapolo, Lance...

Who do you think lands where? Especially focusing on the teams drafting before us. 

 

2. HOU - prob rookie

4. Colts - Carr? Jones?

5. Raiders - Brady? Rodgers? 

8. Falcons - Lamar? Rookie? Roll with Ridder?

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GOAT said:

There should be some QB's available via trade and free agency this year. Brady, Rodgers, Jones, Jackson, Carr, Tannehill, Garrapolo, Lance...

Who do you think lands where? Especially focusing on the teams drafting before us. 

 

2. HOU - prob rookie

4. Colts - Carr? Jones?

5. Raiders - Brady? Rodgers? 

8. Falcons - Lamar? Rookie? Roll with Ridder?

 

Houston-rookie

Colts-rookie

Raiders- FA veteran.  Roster is too stacked to wait on a rookie to develop.

Falcons-?????????? Who the heck knows.  Whispers were they weren't overly impressed with Ridder.  Could be a rookie, could be a veteran.  Scary enough, we are in the same boat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Chicago could trade their pick to someone looking for a qb like Saints, Commanders, Jets, etc.

2. Houston draft qb

3. Arizona goes dline but they could always trade back

4. Colts draft qb; no way they roll with another vet

5. Seahwaks depends what happens with Gino

6. Detroit probably not but they could take a qb if they really like one

7. Raiders dumped their vet so maybe they want a qb

8. Atlanta is in the same boat as us; took one last year will they again?

9. The cupboard is bare.

I see more scenarios where we don't get a top 3 qb than where one drops to us.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, GOAT said:

There should be some QB's available via trade and free agency this year. Brady, Rodgers, Jones, Jackson, Carr, Tannehill, Garrapolo, Lance...

Who do you think lands where? Especially focusing on the teams drafting before us. 

 

2. HOU - prob rookie

4. Colts - Carr? Jones?

5. Raiders - Brady? Rodgers? 

8. Falcons - Lamar? Rookie? Roll with Ridder?

 

I am guessing the following aren't FA available: Brady, Rodgers, Jones, Jackson, Tannehill

Carr and Garoppolo will definitely be available.

Lance is a maybe.

Houston goes rookie.

Colts are very hard to say without a coach. I tend to think rookie.

Raiders will try Brady and see if that happens. I think they opt for a veteran.

Falcons strike me as a rookie or veteran FA.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, rebelrouser said:

1. Chicago could trade their pick to someone looking for a qb like Saints, Commanders, Jets, etc.

2. Houston draft qb

3. Arizona goes dline but they could always trade back

4. Colts draft qb; no way they roll with another vet

5. Seahwaks depends what happens with Gino

6. Detroit probably not but they could take a qb if they really like one

7. Raiders dumped their vet so maybe they want a qb

8. Atlanta is in the same boat as us; took one last year will they again?

9. The cupboard is bare.

I see more scenarios where we don't get a top 3 qb than where one drops to us.

 

idk man it seems like every year one or two QB's fall that nobody on earth would've imagined.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If the Bears don't put that pick on the auction block they're crazy. That roster needs a lot of help. They don't need the #1 pick. They need a lot of picks.

I think they swap picks with Indy so they still get one of the Dline studs assuming the draft starts QB,QB. Then that’s where we trade with Seattle to get Stroud I think he will be the QB left 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, rebelrouser said:

1. Chicago could trade their pick to someone looking for a qb like Saints, Commanders, Jets, etc.

2. Houston draft qb

3. Arizona goes dline but they could always trade back

4. Colts draft qb; no way they roll with another vet

5. Seahwaks depends what happens with Gino

6. Detroit probably not but they could take a qb if they really like one

7. Raiders dumped their vet so maybe they want a qb

8. Atlanta is in the same boat as us; took one last year will they again?

9. The cupboard is bare.

I see more scenarios where we don't get a top 3 qb than where one drops to us.

 

I had the same/sim thoughts over one month ago, just two days into my draft class update...... "theres no chance one of the top four makes it the 9th pick". It started with looking at the "meh" cream of WR, LT, CB, and DE/edge........ there are no insane cannt miss guys form the top valued groups. Sooooo more teams will just go for the QB dart......(imo)

Plus I feel AR will own the combine, hes a true freakshow. If he lays down 4.4-4.59 40 along with other eye popping numbers, his stock will jump into the top 8.....even if the current top 8 dont take the bait, some team behind the panthers WILL.

I keep reading Levis, levis, levis reports as well......like 0 chance he makes it out of the top 5.....and hes got a good odds at being #1 overall.....not that i agree.

 

So.......panthers are in deep waters.......this will be a true test for finessererererer. Huge poke hands being played this year and if you/new HC must have one of the top QBs, you got to trade up.....its not going to cheap either.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If the Bears don't put that pick on the auction block they're crazy. That roster needs a lot of help. They don't need the #1 pick. They need a lot of picks.

I would say wait til their 2nd round pick and the drop off would be tiny in DL terms..........but steelers robbed them blinded. Another kicker is that pick was the 32nd so it is a "1st", just no 5th year......but still not worth claypool. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why are most NFL refs senior citizens lol
    • I can't speak to the sample size on the double ACL tears, I could look into it but I am unsure about the quality of data I am able to find. Anecdotally, I don't think that is common for sure.  Well one giant red flag for Dobbins is that of the 3-5 serious injuries he has had in his NFL career, 100% of them have been the same leg. That's not good and it doesn't bode well for his longevity at all. As I have said several hundred times in this forum(in this case it will be in regards to Thomas Davis), outliers are memorable for a reason....because they are outliers. You don't base your decision making on outliers. That's.....stupid. I am also not high on Etienne but he does play special teams and Brooks does not. Currently, I couldn't blame anyone in the FO for choosing a 3rd string RB that can play special teams and has actually played more than 23 career snaps in the NFL in 2+ seasons.  I am not advocating for cutting Brooks but I don't think it's a player I would consider for anything other than a 3rd string role(and likely competing for it, at that) if I am building a roster for 2026. It's not like they are going to get to see him at 100% in 2026.
    • I'm not going to argue against black helmets, but love our silver helmets. No one has anything similar. If you took all the logos off all 32 team's helmets, you could pick out our helmet easy. 
×
×
  • Create New...