Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is your unpopular opinion?


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

Unpopular opinion....

1. Most players on our roster that other teams would consider good are considered trash on this board.
2. There is a small handful of posters on this board that are miserable and ruin the general experience for most. 
3. We have a team that is in a good position to plunk in a QB and try to content. We are close. LFG!!

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt Moore was a better QB than Jake Delhomme the moment he joined the team. He deserved a chance to compete with Jake in 08 and would have made us a more complete team. We would have beaten Arizona in the playoffs. Jake was the weak link holding us back that year. 

Edited by OneBadCat
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

Matt Moore was a better QB than Jake Delhomme the moment he joined the team. He deserved a chance to compete with Jake in 08 and would have made us a more complete team. We would have beaten Arizona in the playoffs. Jake was the weak link holding us back that year. 

probably true... but EVERYONE loved Jake.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

What’s one of your core beliefs that get you shunned by the rest of the fanbase?

Here are mine. 

A) Brian Burns is overrated and will never be on the level of Peppers, Johnson, Rucker. Maybe Addison. 
 

B) Had John Fox been retained he would have had the same and likely more success than Rivera. 
 

C) I never really liked Christian McCaffrey. Was a playmaker but he really made our offense predictable. People rooting for him with the 49ers make me eye roll.

We will be stuck in mediocrity for the next X amount of years. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

Unpopular opinion....

1. Most players on our roster that other teams would consider good are considered trash on this board.
2. There is a small handful of posters on this board that are miserable and ruin the general experience for most. 
3. We have a team that is in a good position to plunk in a QB and try to content. We are close. LFG!!

These aren't opinions, they're facts.

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I see the comments daily.

 

Some guys brought up Cam not jumping on the ball in the game thread because Josh Johnson didn't dive on the ball.

We never see Luke Kuechly slander. Never see TD slander. Hell you don't even see Smitty slander and he was a ticking time bomb.

So what's your point? We have CMC slander too. We're allowed to not like players. And just to make you boil, mine is ... Cam Newton was not an elite QB. He was only very good.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, GOAT said:

tanking does not exist. it's a theory created by fans when they think their team is losing on purpose to get a good draft spot. teams don't tank, these guys all have to play / coach their hardest to earn their checks / contract increases / job security. trading key players for draft picks is not tanking, it's smart financially and helps rebuild the team.

We just need to change the name of the term. ZERO players will ever tank (unless they are gambling). Most coaches will not tank. I'd imagine many owners/GMs would like the team to tank but they can't control that. What we as fans are actually thinking when we say "tank" is that we are 100% ok if the team loses out, and we hope they lose out. We don't actually think/hope they throw a game. So ... we just need to come up with a new name for what we've be calling tanking. IOWL (I'm ok with losing) lol.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First off, my memory is faulty and so I should remember you. Anyways, welcome back. Having been around here since 2004/2005, I do have to say all these hot takes are not necessary new. I still very much remember all the constant complaints about Jake Delhomme. How he was too inaccurate, fumbled the ball too often, threw bad interceptions, and how Steve Smith deserved a better QB. How this franchise needed to replace Jake for someone better because he dragged everyone down. We even had names for Jake defenders; Blind Delhomme Jock Sniffers (BDJS). That one thread about Chris Weinke over Jake Delhomme because Weinke threw for 423 Yards but only scoring 13 points remains the worst hot takes I've ever seen around here. So to me, it feels like history repeating itself again and I don't feel like getting that much involved in flame wars like I used to. I am more of a sit back and see what the players/team does type of person. And even then, yes, there are so many moving parts that it's not as easy to pinpoint the core issues, especially when you're not inside the building and know every single detail.  And yes, I think even way back then, I hated how overvalued the QB position was and it hasn't gotten much better. It's to where my philosophy has shifted to where if you can't win a SB with a QB on their rookie contract, you might as well get another one. Otherwise, you have to give that QB so much money that the rest of the roster suffers and your window becomes quite narrow.  That's why I'm skeptical that Mahomes/Burrow/Jackson/Allen will win more than one or two SB's between them. None of them look as invisible as they did a few years ago and that's because their targets are much inferior and/or they are getting more roughed up behind a worse O-line.
    • Haha I was still off was thinking of mac jones he has done extremely well this year with basically no weopons as all the 49ers are hurt except for mcaffrey but he is playing slow this year for some reason. 
×
×
  • Create New...