Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is your unpopular opinion?


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

Another one: I can't recall why Moose went to Chicago for a few years but I'm still a bit miffed that he did.  Could've had at least one more SB run but no, we had to suffer with Keary Colbert and over the hill Keyshawn Johnson. By the time he came back, Jake had the Tommy John and wasn't the same anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, outlaw4 said:

Another one: I can't recall why Moose went to Chicago for a few years but I'm still a bit miffed that he did.  Could've had at least one more SB run but no, we had to suffer with Keary Colbert and over the hill Keyshawn Johnson. By the time he came back, Jake had the Tommy John and wasn't the same anymore.

Make It Rain Money GIF

 

every time you dont know why or what- money is the reason. I think (almost) it was nearly the highest WR contract, that part is a little foggy.....but it was a huge contract and his panther cap number was too high cause big brain herniay re-did mooses to gain "space". I know that tried to resign him, but that was before bears came in hoooottttt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Basbear said:

/cdn-cgi/mirage/2956278b3ec8f4cc8a9dbfbd64b62e9db6f4c40a4ef1df5a17d65f15bf0f8f02/1280/https://media2.giphy.com/media/2u11zpzwyMTy8/200.gif

 

every time you dont know why or what- money is the reason. I think (almost) it was nearly the highest WR contract, that part is a little foggy.....but it was a huge contract and his panther cap number was too high cause big brain herniay re-did mooses to gain "space". I know that tried to resign him, but that was before bears came in hoooottttt. 

Yeah, I couldn't recall if there was any motivation other than the obvious. It's one of those what-ifs alongside whether a non-Tommy John Jake would've avoided that one game. I think we could've reached the SB but lose to the Steelers because holy moley, we can never beat the Steelers. 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This off season we need to draft a play maker WR or TE at #9. Roll with Corral and a Vet like Mills from Houston. Corral didn't get an opportunity, and we spent a 2nd rd pick on him. Might as well see what he can do.

There will not be an elite QB at 9, and we would need to give up a lot to move ahead of everyone who wants one. If we are going to roll the dice and reach for a QB at 9, we might as well just try Corral instead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...