Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fitterer on drafting a QB this year


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Just because you still have your first next year doesn't mean you have to get another quarterback with it but the point is you could if for whatever reason you felt Richardson wasn't the one or like Gruden, Reich starts collecting quarterbacks. Everything I see suggests that Richardson has the athleticism and arm of a great qb. But Reich said his players had to have good fundamentals and accelerated vision. I heard he maybe be erratic in his fundamentals and his decision making was suspect.

He is also his very high on accuracy.  The prospect must have good accuracy as a passer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

Those teams traded up for the 3 qbs you listed 

The argument is about what it would take to get into the top 2 or 3 and whether it worth it.  For the highest in Josh Allen at 7, the Bills ultimately traded 2 2s and an OT that didn't work out for the Bengals to move from 21 to 7.  The Ravens traded down 2nds and 6ths. Not what we're talking about here. 

Compare that to the 49ers giving up 2 firsts and a third to get Lance at 3.  You think any of these guys merit that kind of capital?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Let's move up and do it. This game convinced me. 

 

After relentlessly watching 20+ hours of footage of Stroud …. I’d caution everyone to look through the sparkliness…

 

Stroud has some great qualities… but the pieces he needs to work on the most will be damning at the NFL level.

 

first, arm strength. He has a teddy arm… accurate but don’t expect him to be able to put it deep consistently. You can see in the video that he has about 5-6 underthrown balls… the same type of balls that if darnold threw them, the huddle would be tearing him to shreds. Stroud should not get a free pass either. 
 

second, and this is a big one… Stroud has a small case of the yips. If you were to choose to examine every micro second of each of his throws… you’ll notice he has this hesitation problem, as if he second guessing his decision. In college, you will be fine most of the time bc the elite talent on OSU helps make up for that gap. However, at the NFL level this cost football games. I don’t know what it is… but stroud just hesitates on some of his throws

 

Third, in that game specifically, stroud made plays happen through improv moments. He deserves credit for that, and it’s a great quality to have. However, why do you have to have that moment? Why did you abandon your progressions? Why did you slide right when the strong side of your receivers were going left? Stroud puts himself into multiple situations where you have to ask.. “what did you feel in the pocket that made you drift/float in that direction?” OSU does run a moving pocket type of offense, so on plays that it’s intentional, it makes sense. This is the exact issue Baker had last year, he would create sacks on his own by losing pocket awareness.

 

these are all observations and pieces that scouts will be reviewing and asking during his combine. I will say that I don’t believe Stroud has the accelerated vision that Reich brought up. But I’m just an opinion on the internet, nothing more and nothing less.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

I mean he even lost this game despite his all-star WR corps and getting out to a big lead.

I read that he's not even as highly thought of as Fields in Ohio.

His star WR got hurt (couldn’t finish the game) and the other was injured most of the year and didn’t play. He still led them in FG range to win it. It was a longer FG, but he can’t control that it was missed. If you don’t like him I understand, but this would be a tough game to criticize…

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

After relentlessly watching 20+ hours of footage of Stroud …. I’d caution everyone to look through the sparkliness…

 

Stroud has some great qualities… but the pieces he needs to work on the most will be damning at the NFL level.

 

first, arm strength. He has a teddy arm… accurate but don’t expect him to be able to put it deep consistently. You can see in the video that he has about 5-6 underthrown balls… the same type of balls that if darnold threw them, the huddle would be tearing him to shreds. Stroud should not get a free pass either. 
 

second, and this is a big one… Stroud has a small case of the yips. If you were to choose to examine every micro second of each of his throws… you’ll notice he has this hesitation problem, as if he second guessing his decision. In college, you will be fine most of the time bc the elite talent on OSU helps make up for that gap. However, at the NFL level this cost football games. I don’t know what it is… but stroud just hesitates on some of his throws

 

Third, in that game specifically, stroud made plays happen through improv moments. He deserves credit for that, and it’s a great quality to have. However, why do you have to have that moment? Why did you abandon your progressions? Why did you slide right when the strong side of your receivers were going left? Stroud puts himself into multiple situations where you have to ask.. “what did you feel in the pocket that made you drift/float in that direction?” OSU does run a moving pocket type of offense, so on plays that it’s intentional, it makes sense. This is the exact issue Baker had last year, he would create sacks on his own by losing pocket awareness.

 

these are all observations and pieces that scouts will be reviewing and asking during his combine. I will say that I don’t believe Stroud has the accelerated vision that Reich brought up. But I’m just an opinion on the internet, nothing more and nothing less.

People put way too much emphasis on the team outcome when looking at prospects. Mahomes was 16-21 during his college career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

After relentlessly watching 20+ hours of footage of Stroud …. I’d caution everyone to look through the sparkliness…

 

Stroud has some great qualities… but the pieces he needs to work on the most will be damning at the NFL level.

 

first, arm strength. He has a teddy arm… accurate but don’t expect him to be able to put it deep consistently. You can see in the video that he has about 5-6 underthrown balls… the same type of balls that if darnold threw them, the huddle would be tearing him to shreds. Stroud should not get a free pass either. 
 

second, and this is a big one… Stroud has a small case of the yips. If you were to choose to examine every micro second of each of his throws… you’ll notice he has this hesitation problem, as if he second guessing his decision. In college, you will be fine most of the time bc the elite talent on OSU helps make up for that gap. However, at the NFL level this cost football games. I don’t know what it is… but stroud just hesitates on some of his throws

 

Third, in that game specifically, stroud made plays happen through improv moments. He deserves credit for that, and it’s a great quality to have. However, why do you have to have that moment? Why did you abandon your progressions? Why did you slide right when the strong side of your receivers were going left? Stroud puts himself into multiple situations where you have to ask.. “what did you feel in the pocket that made you drift/float in that direction?” OSU does run a moving pocket type of offense, so on plays that it’s intentional, it makes sense. This is the exact issue Baker had last year, he would create sacks on his own by losing pocket awareness.

 

these are all observations and pieces that scouts will be reviewing and asking during his combine. I will say that I don’t believe Stroud has the accelerated vision that Reich brought up. But I’m just an opinion on the internet, nothing more and nothing less.

Only thing I disagree with is Teddy arm, I think that's being EXTREMELY generous to Teddy's arm. He's pretty similar to Burrow in my eyes arm wise who doesn't have top league arm strength but can make the throws but his bread and butter is short and mid range accuracy.

I honestly think that Georgia game watching him work off script answered some of my bigger questions in regards to only being able to work in the system, while yes I think you want them to work in the system he struggled previously when things broke down. In the Georgia game he generally made positives out of that other than a few specific plays I can remember and doing that against that defense is a pretty big step in the right direction for me.

I do think that Georgia game is blinding people from some of his obvious flaws though and I think those are the reason he very easily could be the third QB taken. I'd still be very happy to take him as I think he is the safest QB to take in the first and I think a lot of his issues Reich can help him work through.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...