Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB that is right in front of us


tarheelfan23
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, KSpan said:

It's ultimately up to Reich and the team, but I'd rather see Darnold and his moments hang around then move to Brissett. Am I expecting a miracle? Absolutely not, he'll most liekly suck. But Sam has some dynamics and Brissett is in that 'Alex Smith but lamer' player category that is just so bland and predictable. Alternatively, throw a little more money at Heinecke or something, but don't wave the white flag right off the bat with a guy like Brissett.

What is Darnold's record as a starter?  21-35? Isn't that what you hated on Brissett for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheMaulClaw said:

Then just keep Sam

Sam is erratic.  Good game, awful game, good game, top 5 worst rating ever game.  I'd rather have a steady constant as the bridge QB/placeholder until the rookie is ready.  Teddy Bridgewater was actually a good choice that was overpaid.  It should have been Teddy as the bridge QB and draft Fields. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

What is Darnold's record as a starter?  21-35? Isn't that what you hated on Brissett for?

You ignored what I said about dynamics. If the odds of sucking are equal might as well keep the guy that has shown he can be more dynamic, for better or worse.

I daresay that Darnold's team have generally been worse than at least some of the teams Brissett has played on, but this is going too far into the weeds for a discussion about what amounts to guys whose ceilings so far have been average at best. Brissett has zero dynamics and zero upside, so I'd rather go with someone else. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

What is Darnold's record as a starter?  21-35? Isn't that what you hated on Brissett for?

Sam Darnold has more playmaking ability. 

Sam absolutely wins the NFCS next year Jacoby cant..

We should Go 

Sam

Matty C

Rookie

And start our 10yr domination of the South.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

None of those were first round picks??  Plus not all of the same crew will be drafting these next few years.  You could also argue that Stroud is a ? as well as most QBs drafted.  

You can argue that.. But that is just opinion based backed on more wanting to keep picks then AR-15 the actual prospect.. But that’s okay.. JMO Stroud is worth the trade up..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Sam is erratic.  Good game, awful game, good game, top 5 worst rating ever game.  I'd rather have a steady constant as the bridge QB/placeholder until the rookie is ready.  Teddy Bridgewater was actually a good choice that was overpaid.  It should have been Teddy as the bridge QB and draft Fields. 

Sounds like the others 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Why are you comparing him to Cam?  I've heard some Josh Allen vibes with as raw as he is plus his athletic ability.  Cam was a pretty solid passer right out of college.  Didn't he have like 4000 passing yards his rookie year?  No one is expecting that from Richardson.  

I threw his name out there because he will probably be the 4th QB with Young, Stroud, and Levis off the board before we pick.  

He's tall, huge, a machine, and run run runs. That's about as Cam as you can get. But the difference is that Cam could pass. This kid can't. It will be a massive mistake to draft him in the 1st round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KatsAzz said:

Great idea! Rodney Peete could be the starting QB and HC Franck Reich could be the backup QB. Why the Panthers haven't thought of this really puzzles me. 🙂

Does that save us a roster spot or cost us an extra one. I’m so confused.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the exception of knowing our obvious needs and who we were talking to along the way, my question is this:  How did so many people start on this Jalon Walker frenzy?  I think this--everyone wants to have a voice, make a prediction.  Now with social media and 24 hour tv, networks, etc.  it is more like a middle school grapevine than it is a process where people actually dig for real evidence and reasons.  Speculative journalism is lazy, and since there are now 2,348.356 podcasters with basement studios blasting nonsense into our phones all day, I think they just cut and paste ideas.  Yes, coaches lie and mislead, but I don't think Morgan or Canales did.  You are only as reliable as your sources.  Was Morgan more deliberate this year?  I think he heard the gossip and decided to downplay WR.  He said, (paraphrasing) "We like our QB room.  We will probably add to it at some point."  Not a lie, but definitely downplaying things. I was convinced that we needed a blazer to keep safeties honest, but to be honest, I am not sure that we have the QB with the arm to keep safeties honest.  We have Coker who is 6'1", Theilen is 6'2", and Legette is 6'3" and now TMac is 6'4"+.  It seems size has more value than blazing deep speed.  If I had known they thought that, I might have gone with TMac all along--I thought he was not a good fit.  And if you look at the Panther guide and consider the talent they met with in the first round, there was only one offensive player--TMac. There was another quote that Morgan made that might have been a bit revealing or at least directive. (Paraphrasing) "We want players that were productive in college."  Well, TMac was very productive. In 2023 and in 2024, he averaged 108.8 yards per game.   He is also a great artist.  Drew this portrait of Bryce Young from memory: Many people spent 3 months absolutely confident that Jalon Walker would play edge here. We had a need at edge, but with Clowney, Wonnum, and Jones, were we OK if we drafted a second round Edge? Was Walker the answer?  Unlike Hunter, he is a versatile player who could be awesome in the right system, but if used as a pure edge, he is not a top 10 player.  I was convinced that we would sign Jalon and as much as I like the kid, I could not feel good about the pick.  Mykel Williams scared me.  Both might be great players, but I could not see it.  So was Scourton productive? He was as a Jr when he was standing.  When asked to be other things, he lost his edge (pun intended). In essence, I think we got the best pure edge when you take away the other things he was supposed to do.  Walker's productivity was based on his versatility--something he would lose as a pure edge--so we would not really be meeting needs at edge.  Scourton, on the other hand, is better when not asked to be versatile.  Princely had 10.5 sacks in the SEC.  It simply makes sense.
    • I think they will too. Renfrow will use this opportunity to get in shape and get paid for it. After he's cut he will probably get picked up by someone after preseason.
×
×
  • Create New...