Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sexy draft Prospect…


WOW!!
 Share

Recommended Posts

Nathaniel  “Tank” Dell- WR Houston

5’10 170lbs 

SPEED, SPEED, SPEED!!!! Agility, AGILITY AGILITY.. I call him “Mr. Peace see you Later”

https://www.espn.com/college-football/player/_/id/4366031/nathaniel-dell
 


Fits 2 needs as a punt returner and downfield speed.. College production was great for a player built like him.. And because he’s built this way and 23 could be a day 2 option in the draft.. I don’t think he makes it to day 3…

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Nathaniel  “Tank” Dell- WR Houston

5’10 170lbs 

SPEED, SPEED, SPEED!!!! Agility, AGILITY AGILITY.. I call him “Mr. Peace see you Later”

https://www.espn.com/college-football/player/_/id/4366031/nathaniel-dell
 


Fits 2 needs as a punt returner and downfield speed.. College production was great for a player built like him.. And because he’s built this way and 23 could be a day 2 option in the draft.. I don’t think he makes it to day 3…

We have neglected KR/PR forever in the draft.

Hence why I said in my offseason predictions that we would do so again.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He works with Brandon White. General tip for those who may not be aware and are really into the draft, check some of the top personal trainers (GoldFeet, Brandon White, routegod) around the league. Scouting becomes a whole lot easier once you identify some of the important circles. Those guys churn out the best of the best throughout the entire draft. You can easily find some 4-7th rounders who turn into legitimate stars just by seeing who works with who. As they say, you are who you surround yourself with. 

 

(Clayton Tune is a dog too btw)

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw the 4 Man Rush podcast talking with a Colts fan and film junkie yesterday, and the Colts fan mentioned that Reich didn't seem to have much interest at all in acquiring smaller, shiftier receivers during his time in Indy. Indy drafted Michael Pittman, seemed to have no interest in Skyy Moore. only WR drafted in an early-ish round during his time in Philly was Dorial Green-Beckham. not sure if that will remain the case here but it's worth mentioning.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stbugs said:

What about resigning Andre Roberts? I know we wasted money on him but he shined in the 3 games he played for us.

Really?  I thought he looked pretty underwhelming...or at least incredibly slow.  A lot of people don't care as long as your returner doesn't turn the ball over, but he had one fumble in 6 returns and almost a second one, but was ruled down just before.

Blackshear is the guy I would like to re-sign for the KR/PR position.  He looked fast and elusive and was pretty sure-handed, not to mention he was a rookie who still has room to develop at that position and as RB depth.  For comparison, he also had 1 fumble, but in 25 returns vs. Roberts' 6 returns.  He also averaged 9.2 YPR on punts and 27.0 YPR on kickoffs, vs. Roberts' 4.5 YPR on punts and 17.5 YPR on kickoffs.  I think with Roberts' age and the fact that he's coming off of a knee injury last year, it's almost a no-brainer to move on at this point.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, vorbis said:

I saw the 4 Man Rush podcast talking with a Colts fan and film junkie yesterday, and the Colts fan mentioned that Reich didn't seem to have much interest at all in acquiring smaller, shiftier receivers during his time in Indy. Indy drafted Michael Pittman, seemed to have no interest in Skyy Moore. only WR drafted in an early-ish round during his time in Philly was Dorial Green-Beckham. not sure if that will remain the case here but it's worth mentioning.

I’ve heard this too. That he likes receivers with size. 
 

Could be a breakout year for Marshall then. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...