Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I wasn't too impressed with Steichen's play calling


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Dude they were 14-3 with that offense and took KC to the damn wire last night.   If you have the players and scheme its a damn hard offense to stop

We went 15-1 once. Philly needs to prove they can be elite longer than just one season before we crown Steichen the next coming of Reid/Payton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Their inexperience showed last night.  Reid showed them why he's still one of the best coaches in the league.  He took them to the woodshed in the 2nd half.

This is the summary.

Thats why I said, "hate to bet against big red" when i thought eagles would win a close game. The other coach was crying at the start and big red was reviewing his IHOP menus already in game mode. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Dude they were 14-3 with that offense and took KC to the damn wire last night.   If you have the players and scheme its a damn hard offense to stop

Let him be a simpleton. He thinks because Hurts has a similar game to Cam Newton he's going to be a one hit wonder. As long as the Eagles retain the core of their team they are going to remain a problem in the conference. If we stop being scared and make a move in the draft for our QB we could be competing with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, frankw said:

Let him be a simpleton. He thinks because Hurts has a similar game to Cam Newton he's going to be a one hit wonder. As long as the Eagles retain the core of their team they are going to remain a problem in the conference. If we stop being scared and make a move in the draft for our QB we could be competing with them.

Word is they may have some trouble retaining that core.  Lots are free agents and then there is the cap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Dude they were 14-3 with that offense and took KC to the damn wire last night.   If you have the players and scheme its a damn hard offense to stop

This is all true and he definitely deserves credit, but they also have a loaded roster. It really helps having a QB on a rookie deal.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

Word is they may have some trouble retaining that core.  Lots are free agents and then there is the cap.

Well you can't keep everybody but we'll find out how they make it work. The NFC is still mostly wide open and when you consider the state of our division we could even be in the thick of things with the right moves. Look at the strides the Giants made with a fairly minimal roster. First things first we need to hit on a QB of our own and we'll be cooking.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

Their inexperience showed last night.  Reid showed them why he's still one of the best coaches in the league.  He took them to the woodshed in the 2nd half.

Ahhhh I remember when 90% of the huddle shat on me for wanting Reid after leaving Philly because he was the main reason Mcnabb couldn’t get it done. Good times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SCO96 said:

They put 35 points last night. And unlike KC, they didn't get the benefit of having the defense score a touchdown. The offense was clicking last night in a lot of areas.

I thought Steichen did rely too much on the runs between the tackles. They weren't effective. The running backs seemed more productive when they attacked the edges of the defense.  Then again he may have abandoned the run game because he didn't feel it was going to be effective that day.

If you subtract Jalen's carries, the RB stat line for the team was 17 carries/45 Yards...less than 3 yards per carry. If you took away Patrick's carries the Chiefs stat line was 20 carries/114 yards...that's 5.7 yards per carry. A more effective running game in the 2nd half would have controlled the clock, kept Mahomes on the bench, and give the defense some time to rest. The lack of the running game and the Eagles inability to really pressure Mahomes (the y didn't record 1 sack) were the biggest surprises for me last night.

 

Yeah, the Eagles' run game was beyond disappointing, but perhaps it was more about KC's underrated defense and Spagnuolo than Steichen's play calling. @t96 , are you still downplaying Pacheco's talent? He outdid all the RBs of the Eagles by himself. It was great scouting by the KC.

On an off note, I bet the Eagles had wished they'd have had Kadarius Toney last night. The Chiefs know how to put a team together---make acquisitions that will get them where they want to go as well as anybody. Either that, and/or Reid and Bienemy just know how to use players better than anyone else.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Dude they were 14-3 with that offense and took KC to the damn wire last night.   If you have the players and scheme its a damn hard offense to stop

We were 12-4 and took Prime Patriots down to the wire also 

I don't want an offense that can almost win, we have had that, I want an offense that can actually win the superbowl

No more moral victories and happy to be there , it's victory or nothing!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Basbear said:

My most unimpressed group was by far phillys defense. 

Yeah, I agree. I just think that Philly could have switched it up a little more on offense. They kept calling passes in the flat on the edge from one side to another, and inexplicably called at least a couple of run plays on what was essentially 3rd and long when they hadn't had success running the ball all night long. He acted like he was determined to do things that had worked all season and the first half of the game (passing-wise), but it wasn't working during the second half. 

My problem is that they had KC on the ropes, but basically let them slip away and get the K.O. Siriani and Steichen got out-coached and sucker punched during crunch time.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The big difference for me was that the Chiefs players were schemed wide open over and over, Eagles depended on Hurts being ridiculously good (and wow was he good). Not sure the success at Philly will translate when coaches move to another team without a stacked offense across the board. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...