Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Poll: What do you want Panthers to do for QB?


NAS
 Share

What do you want Panthers to do this offseason?  

217 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you want Panthers to do regarding QB situation this offseason

    • Draft best available QB at current draft position (#9)
    • Trade up with Bears (#1) and draft a QB (whatever it takes)
    • Trade up with Cardinals (#3) and draft a QB (whatever it takes)
    • Sign Derek Carr and draft best available player at #9
    • Trade for Lamar Jackson, fully guaranteed contract (Watson like trade)


Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm getting the feeling that this may be how it shakes out in the end.

Me too.  The fanbase needs some excitement honestly.  New coaching staff is a good start, but bringing in Carr at a fair price will give a nice jolt.  He's not a top 5 QB but people comparing him to Darnold or Baker are just crazy.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, NAS said:

Even if it made sense for the Panthers, I don't think Carr chose to be a free agent to sign a 2 year bridge QB deal.  He will have other suiters for a bigger deal.

Not arguing, just saying that we don't really know what Carr wants.

This is a good coaching staff, a terrible division, and we are in the NFC...very few top end QB's right now.

In his shoes, I'm actually looking for a short deal, I'd want to hit the market again prior to 34.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

Me too.  The fanbase needs some excitement honestly.  New coaching staff is a good start, but bringing in Carr at a fair price will give a nice jolt.  He's not a top 5 QB but people comparing him to Darnold or Baker are just crazy.  

It's hard to get a guage on what Fitterer has planned for the position.  I hesitate to think that Carr really changes anything they have/had planned but ya never know.  He he's definitely been better than anyone we've had since Cam. If it happens I think the contract he's given will tell us a lot about how long they think they will need for these rookies I suppose. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

Me too.  The fanbase needs some excitement honestly.  New coaching staff is a good start, but bringing in Carr at a fair price will give a nice jolt.  He's not a top 5 QB but people comparing him to Darnold or Baker are just crazy.  

My thoughts exactly.  We need to get a rook/young guy, but the team needs to start winning, and fast.

With this offensive staff, and if we can just get a piece or two more on offense, Carr would take us to the playoffs in year 1.  We need that.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Eric4280 said:

I think it depends on traction for AROD to LV. If say GB has that pick, I think they’ll be wanting just whatever premium talent they can get. I really think we organically end up with stroud if HOU falls in love with Levis. It’s gonna be a fun off season.

If he does, it will be interesting to see what Adams thinks since he made the decision to not play with Rodgers. I'm not so sure the reunion would be a welcome one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Zaximus said:

Me too.  The fanbase needs some excitement honestly.  New coaching staff is a good start, but bringing in Carr at a fair price will give a nice jolt.  He's not a top 5 QB but people comparing him to Darnold or Baker are just crazy.  

People are comparing Carr to Darnold and Mayfield? 😳

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Zaximus said:

Me too.  The fanbase needs some excitement honestly.  New coaching staff is a good start, but bringing in Carr at a fair price will give a nice jolt.  He's not a top 5 QB but people comparing him to Darnold or Baker are just crazy.  

People label any QB on their second team as a “retread” unless they are a hall of fame type guy. 
 

They treat them all the same lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Lamar Jackson shouldn't even be on this list. 

 

Lamar talk is just talk on this sub. Ravens have not put him on the trade block as of yet. I think they cave in and offer him more guaranteed money at the end of the day.

 

Aaron Rodgers is more likely to happen if we trade for a QB.

 

Not sure if Rodgers would mind coming here but he would be the dream scenario if we can't get a QB in the draft.

Don't think Bal values Lamar as much as Lamar values Lamar.

The Ravens have been a consistent winning team for 20 years, they were winning before Jackson, and if he's going to cost too much, they will move on and keep on winning.

The very rare team that is good with and without great QB play.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there an option where we absolutely grab a QB, but if we miss on Stroud at 1.09 we take best player available and get another QB in a later round?

Opinion: No doubt we need to add a young QB to develop (along with Matt C.) in this system with all this coaching everyones hyped on, but does it have to be QB at 1.09 or higher at all costs? If BPA is a QB fine, but lets not box ourselves in lads!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can say that I have defended Canales because I get that they are doing all they can to keep from looking like idiots for drafting Bryce, from the trade up to signing $150m guards to drafting XL and Brooks etc---nothing seems to work.  And Hiring Canales was part of the Bryce Young rehab program, so so he can't really decide to "move on."  That has to come from Morgan and Tepper. Personally, I think Bryce is due for an injury.  He is small, he is not thick, and he has been a LOT more healthy than most any other QB has who has endured so much pressure.  The thing that bothers me is this---Bryce really does not go through his progressions quickly.  He locks on to his presnap read and stays locked onto him for too long--he seems to fail to anticipate the WR/TE's positioning on the play before the cut--for example, if the WR is running a dig and the CB has his back to the inside of the field, he should be open for a second or less just after the cut.  He seems to wait until the cut has been made before deciding, then checking down quickly while moving in the pocket. OL:  There seems to be a lack of communication--is that on Mays?  Watch this team presnap--they seem a bit confused at times.   I can almost predict the success rate of the play by watching the center and QB before the snap.  
    • Anyone else remember back in 2010 when Fox piloted having music under the in-game replays during one of Carolina's games? Not the commercial bumpers but the actual replay clips that the announcers would talk over. Pretty sure it was vs the 49ers. And it was terrible. Point being, Carolina continues being so bad that we get the networks trying things out during their games.
    • Is it bad I found this video more hilarious than pathetic? I am still laughing at that one play where half the people on the field ran into each other and Bryce still couldn't see Chuba wide open... Also laughing at Cade blocking nobody and somehow losing his cleat Man this offense is a poo show
×
×
  • Create New...