Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Price to move into top 3 based on past trades.


panther4life
 Share

Recommended Posts

Here's a recent look at the history of top 5 overall picks traded 

**There are trades where future 1st became top 5 picks but this is strictly regarding trades made to move up in a current draft. For example the Browns could have had Watson at 12 back in 2017, but traded down to 25 with the Texans and received 4th overall from the texans in the next draft. Kind of ironic considering they just paid 3 first rounders plus to get him years down the road.

First number 1 overall:

Last traded 2016, Titans to Rams, 

Titans received: 2016 picks: 15, 43, 45,76. 2017 1st(became 5th overall) and 2017 3rd (pick 100)

Rams received: 1st overall, 4th and 6th round pick

The last time number 1 overall was trade in 01 for Vick

2nd overall pick:

Last traded 2017, 49ers to Bears

Bears received 2nd overall pick

49ers received 3rd overall pick, 67, 111 and the bears 3rd in 2018

2016 the Eagles traded up from 8 to 2 with the browns

Eagles got 2nd overall pick, and a 2017 4th round pick

Browns got 8th overall pick, 77, 100 and 2017 1st round pick and 2018 2nd round pick

3rd overall pick: Last trade 2021, Dolphins to 49ers

49ers got 3rd overall

Dolphins got 12th overall, 1st and 3rd round picks in 2022, 1st in 2023

2018 the Jets traded from 6 to 3 with the Colts

Jets received 3rd overall

Colts received 6th overall, 37,49 and a 2nd round pick in 2019

4th overall pick: Last trade 2014 , Browns to Bills

Bills received 4th overall

Browns received 9th overall, 1st and 4th in the 2015 draft

5th overall pick: Last traded Jags to Bucs

Jags received 5th overall

Bucs received 7th overall and 101

These trades should serve as a good gauge for what it may take for us to move up to select a QB inside the top 1-3.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fwiw it’s worth outside of the Gettleman years we have largely knocked our 1st round picks out of the park, yet it’s done nothing for us. Getting Cam got us closer to back to back winning seasons and even a Super Bowl performance. So I don’t know that losing a couple 1st round picks is really the end of the world, especially if it lands us a franchise QB.

We also tried to trade the farm for Watson, so I can see Tepper and co being on board if we identity the right guy.

We have made the playoffs 8 times as a franchise. In 96 it was largely because of our defense. 

With Cam we made it 4 times and 3 other times with Jake at the helm. It’s no coincidence that they are the 2 best QB’s in our history. 
 

When looking at recent Super Bowl winners, or even conference championship teams, they all have a top tier QB paired with a good HC.

Im all in on at least trying taking a swing for one, as opposed to the 0 back to back seasons us nailing 1st round picks has done for us.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...