Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers met with Hooker per report

raleigh-panther

By raleigh-panther,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

The injury is a huge deal.  You are basically buying an older used car with ball bearing issues already.  Can they be fixed?  Probably.  Is there a chance the wheel is effed up.  Sure potentially.  Now add that to his already shaky draft profile and the I say fug that.   Let someone else buy that lemon.  

Yes it can be fixed. Burrow tore his ACL and MCL his rookie year and looks fine. Watson tore his ACL and came back great. Hell TD tore his what 3 times? I understand the other issues, but he wasn’t going to start week one regardless IMO.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted (edited)

I don’t know why the media keeps putting out the talking points of his agents.. Because he tore his ACL way Late in the season and in no way is he going to be ready for camp.. It takes at least a year and a half of rehab to feel normal not to mention the mental aspects of recovery.. I doubt he plays at all next year without seriously being at risk for re-injury.. And it will be year 2 before he feels normal on his knees..

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheMaulClaw Mentor

TheMaulClaw

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Castavar said:

I would 1000% rather draft Hendon than draft Levis tbh. Go look at their college numbers from last year, it's like night and day between the two.

 

Levis was a monster the prior season.  Kentucky was riddled with injuries this year.  Levis can play, don't be fooled.  He has talent.  Not saying he's who I'd want first, but we could certainly do worse.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, TheMaulClaw said:

Levis was a monster the prior season.  Kentucky was riddled with injuries this year.  Levis can play, don't be fooled.  He has talent.  Not saying he's who I'd want first, but we could certainly do worse.

"Talking about a body of work, a game that was his best, I need to see more and I need to see a lot more"- Levis stans favorite 2021 game broken down on the QB school

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kentucky Panther Mentor

Kentucky Panther

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, TheMaulClaw said:

Levis was a monster the prior season.  Kentucky was riddled with injuries this year.  Levis can play, don't be fooled.  He has talent.  Not saying he's who I'd want first, but we could certainly do worse.

He’s not my top choice but I’d definitely rather have him over Richardson or Hooker. Most people that do this for a living agree. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doc Holiday Grand Master

Doc Holiday

Posted
Posted

So, Hooker is my number 2 QB on my board, behind CJ Stroud. 

I also don't believe Bryce Young will go in the top 15 of the NFL draft. His size will likely scare a lot of teams off him. Before you say that Murray was drafted high, Murray is short and stocky; Young is short and a stick. Big difference. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, Doc Holiday said:

So, Hooker is my number 2 QB on my board, behind CJ Stroud. 

I also don't believe Bryce Young will go in the top 15 of the NFL draft. His size will likely scare a lot of teams off him. Before you say that Murray was drafted high, Murray is short and stocky; Young is short and a stick. Big difference. 

To be fair, Murray's also not very good.

As far as true quarterback skills, Young is really good.

But his size is... concerning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

To be fair, Murray's also not very good.

As far as true quarterback skills, Young is really good.

But his size is... concerning.

So, Murray isn't very good. Murray's and Carr's career passer rating are almost identical, and the rushing yards (especially considering their years in the league) aren't even close. If Murray isn't very good, then Carr isn't either, yet you act like an undercover Carr Stan. How ironic.

Edited by top dawg
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, top dawg said:

So, Murray isn't very good. Murray's and Carr's career passer rating are almost identical, and the rushing yards (especially considering their years in the league) aren't even close. If Murray isn't very good, then Carr isn't either, yet you act like an undercover Carr Stan. How ironic.

Just so I'm clear, you plan to carry this particular psychotic break into every thread? 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...