Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gantt indicates the Panthers should bring in Carr

TheMaulClaw

By TheMaulClaw,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

nogoodbum Contributor

nogoodbum

Posted
Posted

Keeping in mind that the football world is in the peak of the 'LYING SEASON', that will continue thru free agency & the draft. Talking heads will post anything as "facts" for clicks & reads. Please consider all of these "facts" with a grain of salt. Carolina FO & coaches should talk to Carr & any other player that could improve the team. If Carr fits into what they want to achieve, offer him a reasonable deal, if he declines, move on to the next. Reasonable offer: three years in the 80-100M range, starter position to be determined by his performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Stuart Smith said:

 

 

Before I would pay Brissett 15 mil I would pay 30 for Carr. Difference of 15 mil for some decent vs a place holder. 3 years max while developing a quarterback. I hope whatever happens we draft a quarterback with our first pick.

30 mil is about my ideal price for Carr and about 10 mil my ideal price for Brissett. Now, would definitely prefer less but I would personally get a little concerned if we saw prices over that for either of them.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, Ornias said:

Would Brissett be an option? 2 year bridge contract for like 10-15m a year. 

I'd much prefer Brissett over Carr due to price and I don't believe the talent gap is a large as some people would point out. Like the difference between the 10-12 best QB in the league vs. the 15-17th

 

no matter what though we HAVE to get a rookie QB. we have kicked this can down the road for FAR too long 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
Posted
59 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

As much as we talk about Carr we sure are taking our sweet time meeting with him.

 

Is a meeting coming or is this just talk for a guy we aren't even interested in?

 

He's been a FA for 2 weeks now.

Seems like the Rodgers decision is the first domino needing to fall.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wolfcop Grand Master

Wolfcop

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

People better get used to Brissett.

 

Carr wants a bag and we don't have the money to go after him. We don't seem interested in Rodgers/Lamar either.

 

Brissett/Rookie QB always seemed like the most realistic option.

Not sure what we ultimately do, but $35M is not "a bag" for a veteran QB who has had the success that Carr has. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

Not sure what we ultimately do, but $35M is not "a bag" for a veteran QB who has had the success that Carr has. 

If and this is a big IF, the coaches think he's the franchise QB for the next 4-5 years, then sure.  But as a two-year bridge QB?  That's a lot of assets tied up for something that's not a long term solution, especially when that money can be allocated to other positions to shore them up.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
heel31ok Experienced

heel31ok

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

If and this is a big IF, the coaches think he's the franchise QB for the next 4-5 years, then sure.  But as a two-year bridge QB?  That's a lot of assets tied up for something that's not a long term solution, especially when that money can be allocated to other positions to shore them up.

We could go after mike white for 4 yrs cheaper than what Carr wants for 1 yr.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Geno to Seattle not set in stone?

If you're Smith, do you risk leaving the OC and coaching staff that helped bring you back into the limelight?

If I were to guess, I'd say it probably depends at least somewhat on whether you think they're going to stick with you 🤔

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PootieNunu
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By PootieNunu · Posted

      It's funny how the teams with the great QBs stay at or near the top of the league every season.  Yes it is a team game, but the QB has the biggest impact in most NFL football games. 
    • d-dave
      The Bryce Young "Game Winning Drive" narrative needs to end

      By d-dave · Posted

      Look, no one is ever a perfect player.  Since the QB handles the ball on 100% of plays offensively (unless there's a direct snap to a RB or something), I can absolutely see where they get an outsized blame and gain from what happens at any given snap of a football game.   Theoretically, there shouldn't even be a stat or idea to a 4th quarter comeback or game winning drive because you should already have done that during the game.  Losers!  Right?  Just because you win late doesn't take away the fact you tried to lose the game for your team! I'm not a fan of that opinion, but again, I'm just a moron with a keyboard.   Bryce has limited tools.  Bryce has not inspired the same level of confidence in us as Cam Newton did in year 3.  I certainly get that.  We traded a TON of assets to get Bryce, and we still suck.  (I mean, since we've lost games, we're losers right?) I completely understand that some fans are just unhappy with a limited QB and a team that isn't performing well, unless the other teams are worse losers than we are. I will say this:  Bryce will fight until the end.  Sure, he's has some real loser football.   But in close games, he's doing his best to comeback (even against a winner of prevent D). Now is it better or worse if your QB plays their best ball in the first half and sucks 2nd half so long as they finish with 300 yards, 3 TDs for your fantasy points? Who said stats are for winners anyway?  The Panthers and Bryce has a long way to go.  I'm enjoying the winning right now.  Though I do start each game thinking "how will we fug this up today?" Because it's been such a poo show in the Tepper era.  Will he prove to be a legit starting NFL QB?  Maybe not here as evidence by our record with QBs who were high draft picks.  
    • KillerKat
      The Bryce Young "Game Winning Drive" narrative needs to end

      By KillerKat · Posted

      Ive never liked the term game winning drives because they include games where the QB was part of or was the reason the team was behind in the first place. Ive been arguing against this stat since the Delhomme years. It should only count when the QB is out of the equation of reasons why the team fell behind in the first place and is at least half the reason why he led the last drive to give them a lead. It shouldnt count if they just hand it off most of the time and the RB is on fire and they go down and score a TD or FG.
×
×
  • Create New...