Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which side of the fence are you on.... sell the farm to move up to #3 or sit tight at 9?


TheBigKat
 Share

Which side of the fence are you on? Sell the farm to move up to #3 or sit tight at #9?  

81 members have voted

  1. 1. Move to 3 or not



Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Varking said:

Just pay the extra and go to 1. Show the world who our guy is that we identified and said would lead us going forward. Don’t stop at three and hope that 1 and 2 pass over our guy. Don’t go to the 3 just to settle for the third best. 

yep and the bears can easily move up if they want or they stay put and still get the best tackle in the draft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

with this staff you move the fug up

This is my thinking. Give these guys the EXACT player they want. If you are Tepper, empower your GM to get the guys you just hired the exact player they want at the most important position in football. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Cavscout said:

Chose 9 because the option to trade down wasn't there. Would rather get Hooker or McKee in rd2 and get more picks. 

Completely agree. If we trade the farm for a guy turns out to be Trubisky or Zach Wilson, this franchise is on its heels for another 5+ years. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You stay put at 9 and see who falls. If the big 4 are gone, then try to trade down for the next QB the staff likes. We apparently like Hooker. By staying put we're not risking future draft capital, and we're ok if Hooker poops the bed. We can find another QB with the 2024 or 25' draft.

When you try to trade up you run head long into negotiations with teams that have a lot of offers, and they see you as QB desperate. Not good. And losing future 1st round picks for QB who might flop horribly is an extreme gamble. If he's bad the whole Panthers staff is in BIG trouble, and we have no 1st for 24' and possibly 25'. Hell no. Don't do that.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a negotiated price for #1 would look like: Pick 9, Pick 39, 2024 1st, 2024 3rd, 2025 1st, & maybe a player

If that's the case, I'd like to think Chicago wouldn't have an issue throwing us a mid rounder in return as well with Pick 1.  Ends up with...

2023: 7 picks total 1-1, 61 (2nd), 94 (3rd), (3)4ths (one from Chi) and (1)5th

2024: 6 picks total 2nd, 4th, (2)5ths, 6th, 7th

2025: All picks sans R1

And then who knows, by the time 2025 rolls around, maybe there's an opportunity where we've netted a first through a separate trade.  

This year could still end up with a group like:

1-Stroud QB, 2-Downs WR, 3-LaPorta TE (or something along those lines, get some defensive players with the later picks)  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

if you go to 3 might as well keep going, not much difference

An extra 1st.  Moving to #3 may just be this years and '24 first along with some other late picks. I'm not sure if you are aware, but just moving from number 3 to 1 is 800 points, or equivalent to the #21 pick....which happens to still be a first round value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Best I heard its a clause the bungals want to add. It prevents them form paying the full guaranteed amount if triggered. No one knows the details of the clause, but guesses are it relates to off-field stuff. Stewart is in the right here. Before they signed burrow, chase, and Higgins they were the cheapest team in the league bar none. Unlike tepper or jarrah Jones or any other NFL ownership, all Mike brown owns is the beagals. Every other owner has many other money making businesses, not bungals.  I still remember when Brenston Bunker was starting on WFNZ and he told the story about the beagals telling him to pick a used cup form a huge pile, LOLS! They been on hard knocks and I remember Marvin lewis telling the players not to take home Gatorade bottles........* but in that case, I believe some players were taking a back pack and filling it up with drinks. Still you make millions(around 200million) in net profit and Im sure coke gave the team those bottles, still... Its a 32 team billion business, someone has to the cheapest.....Panthers were around the next cheapest team before tepper bought them and he has POURED millions upon millions into the team. He bought a bubble that Richardson never would, so the team had to gather in building during the rain. He spent millions on coofus machines that he just gave away like the bubble. Tepper made that AC trailer a thing. I've trashed him about his concerts and taking away end zone seats from fans. But the guy will spend money any way to efforts to better the team, dang I just remembered the deal he gave Rhule- more than Andy Reid at the time.  I know results have not came, but Id 100% take Tepper over Mike brown as a owner.
    • There's no way they're shipping you some uniform you haven't seen lol.  I feel like they'd just refund you and ask if you wanted the new one when it launched. Probably just making the blues the primary, or a new helmet for a new alternate/variation.
    • Man even after 5-12 seasons they are able to produce hype videos. 
×
×
  • Create New...