Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Breaking: Lamar Jackson is available as Raven's have placed the non-exclusive franchise tag on him.


thunderraiden
 Share

Recommended Posts

59 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

He's won 75% of his games as a starter.

 

lol some of you dudes just don't want this guy which is fine. Just admit you don't wont him. But when you push a narrative like this dude has fell off is just not true.

 

How has he fell off when he's winning 75% of his games as a starter?

Wins are a team stat, not a player stat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I get it, but he ultimately got what he wanted. Rodgers also was missing camp and got what he wanted from GB. Players still have more control that people think. SizzleBuzz refused to believe it as we all watched Watson strong arm the whole Texans organization even through all his legal issues and walk away rich.

Jackson exists in a post-Watson world, though.

Results so far are indicating it's not going so well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

It's smokescreen season, except when it comes to Lamar Jackson apparently. Teams are making strong statements they are not interested in him. Odd given how this part of the offseason is usually performative.

I think teams have legitimate interest in him, but the cumulative price tag in picks and salary are causing teams to look in other directions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SmokinwithWilly said:

I think teams have legitimate interest in him, but the cumulative price tag in picks and salary are causing teams to look in other directions. 

Sure, but why make definitive statements on it? It doesn't help franchises to leak their intentions.

These are also very concrete statements regarding interest being leaked. There's not a lot of talk about money, it's more or less that teams are stating they have zero interest in acquiring him.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Krovvy said:

Sure, but why make definitive statements on it? It doesn't help franchises to leak their intentions.

These are also very concrete statements regarding interest being leaked. There's not a lot of talk about money, it's more or less that teams are stating they have zero interest in acquiring him.

If I had to guess, it's all part of taking his mom to school as his agent. They're driving the price down. Eventually he will have to hire a real agent, but by that point he'll have hurt his value. They'll come back to the table, but it will be for a lesser price. Pretty standard negotiating tactics I would think. I've done it several times in real estate deals. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JawnyBlaze said:

He’s a good passer and great runner but having to give a quarter of our cap to him AND spend two firsts is a deal breaker. If it was two or three firsts with a rookie deal, sure. A quarter of the cap on a free agent, sure. No to both. Especially one with injury concerns. 

Yup, giving up two or three first rounders to move up and grab a qb is one thing because by the time you have to pay them you’ve got first rounders back. Giving that up and owing $35MM is a tough pill to swallow. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Jackson exists in a post-Watson world, though.

Results so far are indicating it's not going so well.

I mean even if he chooses not to sit he will make 30 plus million to play QB and if he gets banged up at all he won’t play through it just like last year. Having your star QB/locker room leader pissed at your franchise is bad business….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sounds like liquor logic to me. Interesting_Professional_Alcoholic-Reddit-qtqp9v5xauw81-fallback+dash-audio_0_131639.mp4
    • I have also said I think a young Jake Delhomme would be a good pairing for Canales and what he wants to do.  QB has a lot to do with how I think Canales will do.  I don’t think he is in a place where he needs a QB that doesn’t fit what he does.  That’s more problems for a guy who doesn’t need them.   I have said I got no issue with Canales Got none with Bryce if we were to build a Bryce O around him starting last year with a scheme that fit him  I don’t like the marriage of of Canales O and Bryce. Too similar to last year where the QB and O don’t fit in my eyes   
    • Both would be nice to get but Zach will be long gone and Castle doesn’t want to be here. Personally I have moved to Buzelis.  Once he bulks up and polishes his game he has great upside.  He shot bad in the G League last year but that wasn’t reflective of how he shot in high school.  He is 19 and extremely skilled.  Very good athlete as well.  Do want. I think Ron Holland is another guy with crazy upside.  His defensive game is awesome.  Would like him too
×
×
  • Create New...