If... AR drops to 9, do you take him then?

[top dawg]

7 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

It would be nice if one of these QBs makes it to 9 and we have all of those picks to build around the rookie. 

 

1 minute ago, Kentucky Panther said:

I agree with this. I don’t think this is likely though, and I would be happy to see the Panthers make a move if the staff feels strongly about any of the top 4

If AR or Levis is worth a first, then I'd think that Hooker has to be worth a second. Just food for thought.

I do think that we're going to do our damndest to move up though. I just hope that we don't let Poles take our dignity.

[ForJimmy]

6 minutes ago, Kentucky Panther said:

I agree with this. I don’t think this is likely though, and I would be happy to see the Panthers make a move if the staff feels strongly about any of the top 4

If they think a certain player is their guy I’ll back them until they give me a reason not to, which hopefully won’t happen.

[shaq]

2 hours ago, Martin said:

I almost think Seattle resigning Geno makes it more likely they take AR. It would be a perfect situation where he can sit, learn and develop behind Geno.

Not really considering it’s a 3 year deal, drafting a QB this year almost negates their advantageous rookie contract. Beyond that having more players at a position especially of the caliber Geno played last year reduces the chances of drafting a player at the same position. Adding in Pete Carrols age, he’s most likely hitching his wagon to Geno and investing in him for his last chance at another ring. I could see them taking a QB at 5 but pick 5 is by no means the floor for Anthony Richardson. His price is at an all time high after the combine, I expect it to revert a small bit once scouts hear themselves back towards assessing tape.  

[ForJimmy]

6 minutes ago, top dawg said:

 

If AR or Levis is worth a first, then I'd think that Hooker has to be worth a second. Just food for thought.

I do think that we're going to do our damndest to move up though. I just hope that we don't let Poles take our dignity.

Hooker is worth a 2nd, but does a desperate team like Tampa use their first on him and leave us with nothing if we go that route? Counting on a QB in the second is definitely risky too.

[frankw]

I would roll the dice on him if the other top 2 QB's were already off the board.

[Brooklyn 3.0]

Hey look, another (insert Draft QB) thread that could've been put in the mulitple draft threads!

[Jon Snow]

1 minute ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Hey look, another (insert Draft QB) thread that could've been put in the mulitple draft threads!

Over/under is 30 prior to the draft. What you got? 

[Brooklyn 3.0]

14 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Over/under is 30 prior to the draft. What you got? 

54

[jayboogieman]

3 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

And ceilings are for fans. 

[ForJimmy]

39 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Hey look, another (insert Draft QB) thread that could've been put in the mulitple draft threads!

But should we trade for Fields??

[Jon Snow]

24 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

54

I think I may have set the line too low. I lost count at one point but now I think there's been a dozen already. 

[SteveSmithTD89]

1 hour ago, Mother Grabber said:

last mock i saw had all 4 gone by pick 7, and it was by an expert so it has to be right 

Man we (as a board) do this same song and dance every year lol. 

Edited March 8, 2023 by SteveSmithTD89

[bobcat91]

I wouldn't take AR with a 7th. Its apparent that a lot of folks have never seen him play.

[Basbear]

6 hours ago, top dawg said:

 

If AR or Levis is worth a first, then I'd think that Hooker has to be worth a second. Just food for thought.

I do think that we're going to do our damndest to move up though. I just hope that we don't let Poles take our dignity.

i think the panthers 59th pick is awful hard not to use on him *if the top3-4 doesnt work.

Edited March 8, 2023 by Basbear