Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We’re trading for #1 pick !!!

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Knaakedup Experienced

Knaakedup

Posted
Posted

This is a HUGE win for us. Let’s be honest - Fields hasn’t passed the eye test thus far as a franchise QB and Moore isn’t a true #1.

Now we get a real franchise QB and offloaded our most underachieving WR in one move. 
 

Anyone who’s upset about this forgets that you go absolutely nowhere in this league without a legit franchise QB

  • Pie 3
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
Posted (edited)

A friend of mine who has a source in the organization said it’s down to Stroud or Levis but a decision has not been made yet.

Was also told that there isn’t a decision on how WR will be addressed yet but that the team does trust Terrace Marshall’s development.

Take that for what it’s worth.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Pie 2
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, Floppin said:

I'm 100% ok with that compensation. This is a very good deal at the end of the day.

To move up from #9 I thought we'd have to give up three first rounders plus a player and maybe more high picks.

If I'd have known we could do it at the price we did I'd have been on board with this a long time ago 😃

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

Keeping pick 39 is huge for this year's draft capital.  

We keep 2025's first. 

I mean, we're gonna miss DJ but we've still got our whole draft minus pick 61.  Not to mention, the 1st overall pick.

Hot damn folks.  They're not playing anymore games.

  • Pie 9
  • Beer 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      Be careful what you wish for

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      Well, Hooker was a guy that was drafted in the 3rd round pick sitting behind a well established starter yet Detroit somehow saw enough to let him go after two offseasons.  Where does that fit into your ideal situation?
    • TD alt
      Be careful what you wish for

      By TD alt · Posted

      Like that matters. That's the first thing. I suggested that it's probably better to let a QB sit and learn, and that's what I meant. Secondly, in what planet am I making excuses, my friend, or engaging in any mental gymnastics in Bryce Young's defense? As I have said, I don't care if he turns into Mighty Mouse, it's time for him to go. In my opinion, he's too short to be a successful QB in the NFL. I have seen enough. I'd rather trade him and take my chances with Hooker, at least he's more of a prototypical size and can actually see where and why he's throwing the ball.
    • ok2h8pep
      About that schedule.

      By ok2h8pep · Posted

      There is a scenario where our team comes out prepared to play football instead of shitting the bed for the first quarter. Every bad Bryce game seems to start with him looking incompetent - the OL looking incompetent - and the defense looking incompetent.  Boom, down 14 before we know what hit us. Imagine a world where we come prepared and play with a lead, and Bryce gets to fulfill his ceiling by managing a game instead of playing catch up. He's bad, but upon reflection he is not Clausen bad.  He can move the team down the field when he gets 4 - 5 seconds in a clean pocket against a soft zone.  I don't think Clausen could do that.
×
×
  • Create New...