Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So... Common Sense Says We're Drafting Stroud... Right????


tukafan21
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Well the last time Tepper let his HC decide who to draft over who he liked we ended up with Horn instead of Fields

If he sits back and let’s his HC decide again (as he should) I’ll be surprised 

The last time Tepper let his HC decide who to draft, his HC was Matt Rhule.

I think it would be safe to let Reich make the pick this time around.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Im fine with either tbh

 

I just prefer Stroud because of the size factor. If Bryce was taller and bigger he is probably the undisputed #1 player in this draft. The only questions with him is size and durability.

Same here. 
 

I just wanted one of these two guys. I prefer Stroud but if these guys prefer Young that’s fine 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Well the last time Tepper let his HC decide who to draft over who he liked we ended up with Horn instead of Fields

If he sits back and let’s his HC decide again (as he should) I’ll be surprised 

And that was a smart decision, Fields isn't going to be a long term high end starter in this league, he's a worse passer than Lamar.  I always felt the Bears should have been trading Fields and draft a new QB anyways.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Im fine with either tbh

 

I just prefer Stroud because of the size factor. If Bryce was taller and bigger he is probably the undisputed #1 player in this draft. The only questions with him is size and durability.

See that’s the thing. Young is a complete QB prospect with one glaring flaw….size. 
 

Should we pass up the best QB because he “might get hurt”? He also might not ever miss serious time. 
 

I guess my point is, the only consistent issue with him is size. He’s the best QB if he was bigger. 
 

It’s a pickle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Some of you act like one can't learn from experience over time. Just because you may not know what you're doing in 2018 doesn't mean that you don't know what you're doing in 2025. Frankly, you grow from experience, and success and excellence gives first-time applicants the hand probably 99.999% of the time.
    • It's an interesting topic of conversation as sports evolves. I think ultimately it would lead to a number of small market franchises folding though. Especially in the NBA where there are so many bad teams that have been bad for years and years in some cases already. But as it stands I think athlete pay draft or no draft aside has reached a point where we can and should realistically ask should they make that much compared to the average person. Now college athletes is a different conversation but even that reaches a breaking point. But we could go down the rabbit hole on this even further into overall entertainment and talk about actors making absurd sums too. In the end I think in sports the powers that be won't allow these changes to even be considered because it opens the door for so many other variables. But who knows how long sports like football will realistically be around after people like us pass on. We're only just now learning about things like CTE which the league and the sport in general will only be able to run away from for so long. As far as the NBA goes my understanding is viewership has been steadily going down for a number of reasons but one crucial aspect is key players missing so many games. The NBA has to figure that out regardless. Especially when considering fans who pay to see these athletes compete in person. But hey I guess let's just try to appreciate what we've got while it still exists in this form eh?
    • I can't see a world where the money goes down, but maybe your lottery odds are now your contract numbers you can offer.  Thunder? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 20 million.  Hornets? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 80 million.  Some form of a system where the money is still there, but so is the freedom of choice (on top of bad teams getting *some* competitive advantage to signing them). 
×
×
  • Create New...