Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why do we have negative Nancy’s about trading for #1?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

You’re really worked over DJ Moore who’s basically a smidge better than Gabe Davis?

 

WRs can be had as FAs or cheap trades, in fact I’m glad we kept a third 1st round pick!!!

 

in case you’ve missed, we haven’t had a solid QB1 since 2018, 4 years of disastrous QB play

 

 instead of hoping or settling Carolina got aggressive and I’m honestly surprised at the trade package we didn’t give up more.

They got stupid.3 more yrs of disaster in the way.When they finally realize it we will need oline and

d line overhaul along with a qb.desperation on parade.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, jasonluckydog said:

 I wanted a vet qb like Carr and see what this staff can do with a player like Corral.

Absolutely nothing, just like he has shown during his entire career.

Carr is a lot closer to Sam Darnold than a guy that can win a SB.

And Matt Corral can hopefully develop into a decent backup.  With 17 games, you need a backup that can win a game or two

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, BrianS said:

The way I look at it is that we traded away two first round picks for the number one pick.  The other stuff isn't really all that worrisome - including DJ Moore.

You're going to give any first round rookie QB at least two years anyway.  By the time we find out what our rookie has (or doesn't have) we'll have a first round pick again.  I just don't see the problem.

Honestly just one first rounder lost and this year's first rounders swapped.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • agree to disagree you are entitled to that opinion even though I find the argument completely bizarre based on data. I could type out a long paragraph discussing those areas but what’s the point. I posted a screenshot that showed Bryce in a similar post snap situation with a free rusher in his face which resulted in a TD - that’s what happened on the play so I posted it. 
    • I've already addressed this notion in a previous reply. You are basing your assertion outside reality if you think Bryce would have not only been more successful but defeated the Patriots in place of Herbert. Bryce got blown off the field by that Patriots team with the highest paid OL in the league. We've seen Bryce with an OL that gave up 65 sacks and it resulted in the #1 pick. And that is not a defense of Herbert or arguing he is a great QB in any way. He has physical talent but he has been similar to Darnold early in his career in terms of his very up and down perfomances. However that does not change the fact that they have significantly less invested in the OL than the Panthers.
    • I think Tepper has been setting the stage where pending there is no miracle he wipes it all clean.  Think you already have been told that with small things like Evero staying.  Bryce is the guy next year.  OC, DC, everything stays the same.  QB room largely the same.  Nothing would really matter there.  They basically get one more shot and it goes how the schedule paired with our 27th ranked O predictably most likely goes.  Everyone out the door together.  Bryce is a bridge tier QB.  I don’t see Dave surviving where he could be bridge QB here in reality. 
×
×
  • Create New...