Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Albert Breer on how the trade happened


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I wouldn't have given up two 2nds plus DJ in that case then. Two 2nds plus DJ is a helluva lot more value than a future 1st.

The report was that we offered three firsts and two seconds but they required DJ and it was agreed upon that he would be the value of the final first round pick. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Honestly, I would've gave up the three 1st rounders. An additional 1st is a LOT more palatable than two 2nds and DJ Moore IMO.

I think it was a bad trade.

If the guy we select isn't a quality starter for the next ten years then we'll go down as a cautionary tale.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh, we are presumably getting our franchise QB and it‘a not taking more than one pick in each of the next three drafts. Net loss of one this year, one next year and one in 2025.  Didn’t like having to give up DJ but it had to be done. I thought the trade was really smartly constructed.  Value was fair to both sides (someone did a draft chart value comparison the other day valuing DJ as a 1st round pick, resulted in the trade being slightly favorable for us) and we get our QB. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at it this way--would we have been given a first rounder for DJ if we traded him?  No.  However, a 2025 first rounder is the current equivalent of a 3rd rounder--so from that perspective, the bears did well.

I mean, to give up your best WR and a late 2nd rounder for a franchise qb (in theory) for 2023 is worth it.  Next year, we should have a ton of cap room, so we can hit free agency for a splash player if we need one.  After that, in 2025, we will want that first rounder.  So I am OK with this deal--would you have done the same in 2011 for Cam Newton?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another thing that people are not talking about with DJ Moore--he seemed to quit at times.  He got frustrated. He broke off routes when he knew the ball was not going to him, but the purpose of that route was to pull the S over---that causes an interception.  How often was that happening? So Moore had some problems that should not be forgotten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FugginPoo said:

If we get a franchise QB out of this it will likely be a bigger fleecing than the Greg Olsen trade with the bears unless Fields ends up being just as good as whoever we draft 

No argument that IF the player works out right the price wasn’t an issue, I have been focused on if they have the bright future, or not. Crap shoot. 

Apparently the Bears don’t think any are as good as Fields or why wouldn’t they trade him and take one of them? 
Who here is sold on Fields? 

Edited by stratocatter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

Look at it this way--would we have been given a first rounder for DJ if we traded him?  No.  However, a 2025 first rounder is the current equivalent of a 3rd rounder--so from that perspective, the bears did well.

I mean, to give up your best WR and a late 2nd rounder for a franchise qb (in theory) for 2023 is worth it.  Next year, we should have a ton of cap room, so we can hit free agency for a splash player if we need one.  After that, in 2025, we will want that first rounder.  So I am OK with this deal--would you have done the same in 2011 for Cam Newton?

Didn’t GB offer their first for him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the contract money an OT first rounder makes you can ALWAYS get a new girlfriend.  And probably an upgrade at that.  You only got 2 parents.
    • Brother. You are wholly confusing comparing situations and applying actual standards like most other franchises do like simply getting into a playoff series and winning at least 1 or 2 series games with praising. Nobody is praising the Hawks. Nobody is praising the Magic. Nobody here likes those teams. But reality is reality. The Hawks like other franchises have traded players fired coaches etc but they can still win a couple playoff games. How is that not the bare floor for you or anyone else? What are we doing here if it isn't? We've seen eye to eye on many things over the years. But you are in the camp on the Hornets where you are emotionally attached to LaMelo where you feel the need to carry his water like he's got that juice. That's cool that you feel that way. It's your prerogative. But I differ from that viewpoint entirely. If he had that juice we would not have gotten wiped off the court in 2 play in games with 2 different coaching staffs and rosters. if people don't like hearing that well I'm sorry but how the hell is this team ever going to get better and ultimately go anywhere in the postseason if we just blindly pat them on the back for getting their asses whooped before they actually even get into the real playoffs? There seem to be some Bryce Young level standards being applied here. That's wild to me. But to each his own.
    • Proctor/Freeling were always the belles of the ball where we were picking. What those two *could* become at OT was far greater than what others could be at their respective positions and I’m glad our FO could see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...