Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Foreman...does he stay or does he go?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

Interesting to see what the offer on the table is. Have heard nothing about him really. Hopefully it's a competitive offer. 

Multi year deal or another one year offer? Good player with stuff left in the tank. 

Opinions?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I imagine that he's testing the market, much like Bozeman did.  Bozeman saw that he wouldn't make $10 million a year, and said he'd come back for a place he likes where he's going to get as good a deal as he can.  Foreman is probably in the same boat.  See who will pay the most because he's a runningback and knows that he's not in the CMC class of big money backs.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, d-dave said:

I imagine that he's testing the market, much like Bozeman did.  Bozeman saw that he wouldn't make $10 million a year, and said he'd come back for a place he likes where he's going to get as good a deal as he can.  Foreman is probably in the same boat.  See who will pay the most because he's a runningback and knows that he's not in the CMC class of big money backs.

I was hoping for what happened with Bozeman. It was eyebrow raising that he only got the deal he did last offseason so  the talk of him on a big money deal seemed a little unlikely. 

Foreman is going to be facing a VERY deep market at RB, so we also might be able to get him fairly cheaply.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

RBs are different animals on the negotiating table.  They have a short life span (most peak at 26-27 and start declining after that--when they are negotiating.  He had the best year of his career, but he is nothing more than a journeyman.  I am sure he wants to get paid, but he is a one-dimensional back who runs hard.  A young QB needs an outlet/checkdown, so he is not an ideal fit here.  I bet they lowballed the hell out of him--no more than $3m.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CRA said:

Foreman will be 27.  I'd welcome him back for cheap.  But we likely saw the best he will ever give. 

We really need to replace Hubbard.  We need a pass catching RB.  

Agreed. Chuba might have the worst hands of any NFL skill position player I've ever seen. Like the dude is trying to catch a football with tennis rackets. Just awful.

  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, but those guys aren't depth guard signings, they're likely going to wait and see who has injuries or players under performing and then sign there. I also think that if Ickey really is going to be able to play at some point this year, that's where our guard depth comes from.  As if he gets to the point of being active, we'd then have 3 LT's on the roster with him, Freeling, and Walker, gotta think one of them not named Freeling gets kicked inside if needed.
    • lol imagine being Hill and this is what your coach thinks about you replacing a guy giving up over 4 goals per game.
    • I don't think Tyreek is a bad player to play with on the field, for sure not in the same way that Diggs is, as he's a cancer on the field with how he acts, and wouldn't take kindly to being 2nd fiddle behind T-Mac. It's that Tyreek is just a terrible person who realistically shouldn't even be in the NFL, his insane athletic ability is why his off field transgressions have been overlooked.  If he was a WR3, no team would have kept him around, it was only that he was a 1st ballot HOF level talent that kept him around. Just zero interest in having a person like that around our young WRs, that's really all it comes down to for me with him. Again, if we were true contenders this year, that changes things and I'd rather bring in the best possible players and hope it works out.  But they're trying to build something here and to do that, you need high quality people, not just great talent.
×
×
  • Create New...