Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers showing interest in RB Jamaal Williams


Saca312
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

we made him an offer. if he wants to be here so bad then all he has to do is docusign it.

When was the offer? I know we supposedly made an offer a few days ago, but Sheena Quick is implying we just made one. I could be reading her tweet wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Xtreme said:

When was the offer? I know we supposedly made an offer a few days ago, but Sheena Quick is implying we just made one. I could be reading her tweet wrong. 

There was an article on the team site the other day that said we had offers on the table for Bozeman and foreman.

one player has since signed, but one player hasn’t…so the ball is in foreman’s hands (pun intended)

Edited by therealmjl
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Jamaal Williams commands 5 million or less a season on no more than a 2 year contract, I could see the Panthers interest.

But if he gets more elsewhere, then good for him. We don't want to overpay.

The FA RB pool is large and the draft is deep at RB. There will be a large supply of RBs out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, rodeo said:

he seems to be a bit of a touchdown vulture judging from his highlights. almost all of his TDs are from within the 5 and there were only a handful of big runs in the open field.

I've noticed a pattern with these FA interests.  Everyone them are known for scoring TDS.  Our guys are known for yards but few TDS. I'm smelling what Fitterer and Reich are cooking. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like Williams as a team leader and positive locker room presence; I'm a big fan and would be happy to have him as a Panther. But he's not a game changer as a running back and we certainly shouldn't break the bank for him. Hopefully the market dictates he and/or Foreman getting a very modest deal

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rodeo said:

he seems to be a bit of a touchdown vulture judging from his highlights. almost all of his TDs are from within the 5 and there were only a handful of big runs in the open field.

Yes, and signing him for that reason makes a lot of sense.

Stroud doesn't (even try) score with his legs and no one wants Young to go for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, rodeo said:

he seems to be a bit of a touchdown vulture judging from his highlights. almost all of his TDs are from within the 5 and there were only a handful of big runs in the open field.

Thats the entire point.

Not to mention he had plenty of touches. Heck his rushing yards are just short of the leading receivers yardage. He was the second most productive player in the team in yards and we'll above the third place.

How does he remotely qualify as a TD vulture?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...