Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Breer on #1, trade down options


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Rags said:

you missed the part at the beginning where he said "We don't know yet"

His guess is way more informed than ours. Two people have said this now so I beginning to believe there's a little smoke to the "If the draft were today" fire

More than two, in fact...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't think we will.

But I do think we're open to it.

Still have to get a good enough offer though...

Only way I see it happening is if Houston is obsessed with a QB, becomes convinced we're going to take him, they panic offering something crazy like #2 & a 2nd rounder this year, & their 1st rounder & a 3rd in '24.

Granted, the odds are only slightly better than winning the lottery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Again no poster or insider has given us a clue as to what a trade with Houston would look like.  

According to the draft simulators I’ve been running, Houston will give us pick 2, 12, 33, and a 2024 1st to move up to 1. The Panthers will then trade them back pick 2 and a 5th rd pick to move back to 1, then trade back down to 3 with the Cardinals to pick up more second and third round picks and recoup the 5th rd pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

The Office Reaction GIF

Hey man, his opinion is worth as much as ANYONE ELSES ON THIS BOARD. We just don't have the Twitter followers to make our sense of self-worth. 

That is a huge pet peeve of mine though. What makes "influencer" opinions more valuable than anyone else's other than the fact that they have "followers"? Charles Manson had followers and we see where that went.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

According to the draft simulators I’ve been running, Houston will give us pick 2, 12, 33, and a 2024 1st to move up to 1. The Panthers will then trade them back pick 2 and a 5th rd pick to move back to 1, then trade back down to 3 with the Cardinals to pick up more second and third round picks and recoup the 5th rd pick.

 

30176161-D2A3-4941-B4A1-4A41EDB49D56.jpeg

Edited by bythenbrs
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, 332nd said:

Only way I see it happening is if Houston is obsessed with a QB, becomes convinced we're going to take him, they panic offering something crazy like #2 & a 2nd rounder this year, & their 1st rounder & a 3rd in '24.

Granted, the odds are only slightly better than winning the lottery.

There is one other scenario I could possibly see, that being that the Texans see us talking to the Colts.

There's also a potential scenario where we actually trade with the Colts, but that only becomes plausible if A) we like three guys and/or B) they make us a ridiculous offer.

Gun to my head, I think we stay at #1. My hope in that scenario is we take CJ Stroud...

...but anything's possible. 

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Again no poster or insider has given us a clue as to what a trade with Houston would look like.  

It wouldn’t be #2 and #12 for #1, like some posters here seem to think. It’s not like Houston is trading up from #7 to #1. It’s a single spot, and I don’t think Houston will part with another first for that. 

Edited by Bama Panther
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NJPanthers89 said:

Definitely not going to get what people think to move back one spot lol, it would be more like a second rounder, or maybe even a 3rd and 4th.  It’s 1 spot lol, multiple firsts aren’t remotely happening.  

I think you could get the second rounder - depends on how much of a threat they feel the Colts are. I doubt we would move to 4 though. I'm perfectly happy staying at one and taking CJ Stroud or Bryce Young. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

I think you could get the second rounder - depends on how much of a threat they feel the Colts are. I doubt we would move to 4 though. I'm perfectly happy staying at one and taking CJ Stroud or Bryce Young. 

Yes a second is plausible, but people thinking we’re getting 12 plus a future first have no idea how the draft works.  I’m not moving back to 4 unless I’m fine with Levis (which I am).  Plus I would def ask for Pittman in the package.  Then it’s like we essentially traded up to 4 for free 

Edited by NJPanthers89
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
    • Supplemental draft uses picks from next year. So a team were to draft him in the 1st, their upcoming 1st next draft would no longer be available. There have been some notable players that were obtained in the supplemental draft, such as Kosar. It doesn't necessarily happen every year either, and is more on a as needed basis. The gambling trouble is a big red flag for teams, and maybe pushes him down to a 4th? Not sure a team would use a 1st on him.
×
×
  • Create New...