Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why not both?


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, RJK said:

It doesn’t not mean that at all either. brian regan what GIF

Really ??

alright let’s step under the learning tree for a moment…

1. WR room is thin in the 1st place anyway.. After trading DJ you we’re adding 2 to 3 WR form the beginning.. Fitt literally said this..

2. The Room lacks experience.. Not good for a Rookie QB.. Adding Theilen and Chark at least gives you 2 WR in the room with “years” of starting experience..

3. Context in the situation - Due to the old regime TMJ got little play time so this his only real time going into a season getting real reps.. Chark has a large injury history.. And bringing in a rookie in a weak WR class isn’t something you can depend on getting a day 1 starter from.. So covering all your basis is the best way to further in sure a stable environment for a rookie QB..

4. Weak draft and weak FA class means you need to throw a lot of dart at the board.. Plain and simple..

None of this is a detriment to TMJ but more about having options and not putting your eggs in 1 basket.. Which is smart moves to make when you’re trying to develop your franchise number 1 pick..

Edited by Sub Zero
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Thielen as he'd be a good slot safety valve for a rookie and would be a great vet presence in the WR room to teach these guys how to be pros, particularly TMJ and whichever WR we draft in the 2nd.

But I just don't see the need for Chark, he's similar to TMJ and very injury prone, just not someone I'd like to see us target as I don't think he brings enough value to us right now.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

I like Thielen as he'd be a good slot safety valve for a rookie and would be a great vet presence in the WR room to teach these guys how to be pros, particularly TMJ and whichever WR we draft in the 2nd.

But I just don't see the need for Chark, he's similar to TMJ and very injury prone, just not someone I'd like to see us target as I don't think he brings enough value to us right now.

Other than saying theyre both tall, i dont think tmj and chark have much else at all in common.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...