Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ron Rivera hints he "didn't mesh" with David Tepper

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr Mojo Risin Mentor

Mr Mojo Risin

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, WUnderhill said:

Tepper went on to “mesh” with Matt Rhule, one of the worst head coaches in league history. That’s a dub for Rivera.

Yes this is true, but you can also now say that all of those decisions has now lead us to Reich and our new #1 pick at QB which could set us up for success for the next decade plus. Hopefully it was all worth it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthero Mentor

Panthero

Posted
Posted

No offense to Ron in particular, but what is it about the Pnathers where former players and coaches feel entitled to piss and moan for getting flushed? Isn't this a professional sports league? Ron sounds like Greg Olsen, "they only paid me x millions, instead of y millions" 

Too bad, so sad, get wrecked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted (edited)

I havent really liked Rivera`s mouth ever since he left here. He talks like he`s a big shot, but in reality only had 3 winning seasons and will forever be known for wasting both Newton and Kuechly`s talents. He really has shown his true colors and has only confirmed what many of us suspected while he was here.

Edited by KillerKat
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Day1PanthersFan Veteran

Day1PanthersFan

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

Luke left because of the many concussions he was dealing with and had nothing to do with Tepper. TD and Greg retired which was on their own recognizance because their time was up and their bodies couldn't take it anymore. Also nothing to do with Tepper.

Greg didn't retire, he got dealt to Seattle 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Day1PanthersFan Veteran

Day1PanthersFan

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, ickmule said:

I mean, Tep is a clown so there is that.  So far he has made zero moves that have improved anything. Time will tell if this new staff is right or wrong and until then he’s still a clown.  

Thank God there is someone else with a brain here 

People already acting like Riech won us a superbowl, let's not forget this same "QB Guru" was recently so clueless about what to do at QB, he was on the phone begging River's to come back , and staked his job on Matt Ryan and Carson Wentz , and was fired 

That's why the red flags went up with the Dalton signing

 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Day1PanthersFan Veteran

Day1PanthersFan

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He didn't get dealt to Seattle. We cut him. He signed with Seattle as a free agent. He retired two years ago signing a one day contract to retire a Panther.

My point is the same, he didn't fit the Tepper vision either, he was canned, just like Cam 

 

Edited by Day1PanthersFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...