Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL insider Jordan Schultz on the #1 pick


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, musicman said:

Personally, who cares. Both Young and CJ will be successful with this staff. I trust who they pick. 

This^^^ 
At this point I’m just so happy that unlike last year we have legitimate prospects at a position of clear need at our fingertips… Nobody is saying “well it’s the QB position so lesser prospects will be pushed up” Nobody saying “ I wouldn’t do it but it’s the QB position” .. We have 2 guy who resumes, tapes, production and skills say they are top 5 picks .. And we are in the perfect position to finally solve a major problem with a equally valued answer..

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Smithers said:

I’m starting to miss the days when the team with the #1 pick negotiated the contract with the player they wanted weeks before the draft 

No this is way more fun and makes me really excited to watch that Thursday night. I know I’m the dog in this experiment but I’m enjoying the anticipation and the excitement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

"Insider" lol. Jordan Schulz is a clown. 

It will be Bryce Young, until it will be CJ Stroud, until it will be Anthony Richardson. 

It's all conjecture and not one person knows definitivly one way or another and until that last weekend in April I imagine nobody will. 

I will be happy with either of Young or Stroud. If we can trade down to 2 and get extra picks plus one of the two I'll be ecstatic.

For whatever you think of Jordan Schulz, this clip is all speculation. 

Not sure how many actually watched the clip, but if you did you know the whole clip is full of "I think", "I think", "I think", "I think".

hitchhikers-guide-to-the-galaxy-dont-pan

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think of Bryce this way---remember Luke Kuechly.  He was a very good athlete (surprising people at the combine) but others were similar to him.  He was 6-3, 235---not huge for a 4-3 MLB by any means.  Other great athletes of similar size were drafted in 2012 but he and Bobby Wagner became the best.  They were/are both very intelligent players, and MLB is the QB of the defense--that is how important Luke was to us--Bobby was/is to Seattle.  

My Point?  While Bryce Young is very small for an NFL QB, the thing that sets him apart is his ability to process and see the field better than the rest.  That makes him more capable of making everyone around him better.  Is that worth the risk of taking a 5-10, 200 lb QB?  That is the decision that must be made, but I want my leaders--on offense and defense--to be very smart. Nothing against Stroud or Richardson or Levis or Herndon--but the special QBs in NFL history, for the most part, were the smartest players on the field.   Manning, Brady, Montana, Mahomes, etc.  

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I think of Bryce this way---remember Luke Kuechly.  He was a very good athlete (surprising people at the combine) but others were similar to him.  He was 6-3, 235---not huge for a 4-3 MLB by any means.  Other great athletes of similar size were drafted in 2012 but he and Bobby Wagner became the best.  They were/are both very intelligent players, and MLB is the QB of the defense--that is how important Luke was to us--Bobby was/is to Seattle.  

My Point?  While Bryce Young is very small for an NFL QB, the thing that sets him apart is his ability to process and see the field better than the rest.  That makes him more capable of making everyone around him better.  Is that worth the risk of taking a 5-10, 200 lb QB?  That is the decision that must be made, but I want my leaders--on offense and defense--to be very smart. Nothing against Stroud or Richardson or Levis or Herndon--but the special QBs in NFL history, for the most part, were the smartest players on the field.   Manning, Brady, Montana, Mahomes, etc.  

 

I have to pushback a bit on this one. Luke was an exceptional athlete with good height and weight just slightly below average. If there was a RAS type scoring for QB attributes Young would ace some of the mental stuff, but size, arm strength etc. would not score well at all. But I get what you are trying to do.

 

image.thumb.png.d2f0b88a2b0d4bcb71dd6f1f984f42fe.png

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Martin said:

I have to pushback a bit on this one. Luke was an exceptional athlete with good height and weight just slightly below average. If there was a RAS type scoring for QB attributes Young would ace some of the mental stuff, but size, arm strength etc. would not score well at all. But I get what you are trying to do.

 

image.thumb.png.d2f0b88a2b0d4bcb71dd6f1f984f42fe.png

Yeah, I see people downplay Luke's physical talent quite a bit. The dude was a freak. You get a Luke type player when you combine elite physical and elite mental traits.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, I see people downplay Luke's physical talent quite a bit. The dude was a freak.

 

He was so smart it kind of made people forget what an athletic freak he was. But it was the combination of the two that made him who he was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

Meh 2011 was a lot worse imo 

You had multiple guys playing multiple positions. On top of that you had f’n Gabbert’s name being tossed around

Cam, AJ, Marcel and Von

At least this time we knew 100% it was going to be QB

2011 wasn’t nearly the 24/7 twitter/hot take/clout chasing crowd that exists now. That’s the issue with it this time. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's just a talking head.  Talking about gambling. If anybody takes the under on 4.5 wins, they're most likely losing their money.   So he's only saying if you want to bet on a possible sleeper, take the over.  It's not rocket science.  Pathetic that so many on the huddle have reduced themselves to posting purely trash every time they hit the submit button.
    • I mean I think the best case scenario has to hit for the Panthers and everyone else in the NFCS has to hit their worst case scenario.  Personally, I think this is the year that NO finally collapses and I think they finish 4th in the division regardless.  ATL is overrated but still likely a 6-9 win team. TB plays tough football, their defense will be there but their success depends on the offense, they too are a 6-9 win team.  The Panthers are probably 4-6 wins at best. If they find some sort of momentum during the season and get 7-8 wins, and TB and ATL struggle then maybe but I find it very unlikely. 
    • We screwed up a couple years ago taking Bryce in the first place.  Nobody held a gun to our head to jump from #9 to #1.  Most people who keep up with draft news knew this 2024 QB class was loaded and we should have waited, which I advocated. It was a dumb move and I knew it.  Now we have to roll with Bryce another year.  That's fine, because this 2025 class isn't that great.  I like Ewers, but not super high on him.  If Bryce shows improvement, which I think he will, that should get him at least one more season before we have to decide on if he's the permanent answer or not.  I've said before, the 2026 draft is the next window for a franchise QB if Bryce isn't the answer. Bryce gets this year and next at a minimum.
×
×
  • Create New...