Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did the S2 TEST take CJ out?

Ivory Panther

By Ivory Panther,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

XClown1986 Mentor

XClown1986

Posted
Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

*you're

I'm 'whining' on a message board because a) I'm British, so good luck getting a foot in the door of an NFL franchise and b) I have a very lucrative career of my own.

There's a reason these guys are fired every other year too - besides someone like Ozzie Newsome, they're all flawed. I mean at one point Thomas Dimitroff was considered hot poo (NFL Exec of the year) and now he has a podcast in his mid-50s.

NVM. I reread the post.

But still, neither a or b make it more understandable that you want to piss and moan that the Panthers don't agree with you.

Edited by XClown1986
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

And Bryce young is better on the field that’s why his haters can only bring up his size and not his play 

I agree, his size is his only true knock - but it's a hell of a knock. 

It's like drafting a CB that runs a 5 second 40 yard dash. His speed is always going to be a problem, regardless of how great his bump-and-run technique or zone coverage is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ncfan Grand Master

ncfan

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

A) How would he know that?

B) whats a "bad" score?

C) what is his definition of working out?

See how easy this is?

How would he know that?  Um it’s not hard.  They have the S2 data.

no clue what they determine is a “bad score”

I’d think working out= being a franchise level QB.  Don’t think working out means your not a franchise level QB

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Purdy had some bad games too. He was projected to go higher and kind of regressed his junior year I believe. I guess my question is if the S2 is the greatest test why wasn’t Iowa St winning more with him at QB? Why are people saying Fields struggles to read defense as he apparently aced it as well? It’s just another source of data to look at like the wonderlic test.

Because Fields has silly haters who don’t like context and can’t imagine what it’s like when EQS and Byron Pringle are playing as your #1 and #2 WR and your offensive line has one NFL worthy player on it.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aussie Tank Grand Master

Aussie Tank

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

I agree, his size is his only true knock - but it's a hell of a knock. 

It's like drafting a CB that runs a 5 second 40 yard dash. His speed is always going to be a problem, regardless of how great his bump-and-run technique or zone coverage is.

He’s been small his whole life and always overcome to be the best player on the field so I can’t see why that can’t continue in the NFL 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Krovvy Grand Master

Krovvy

Posted
Posted

I don't think he scored "low", but if we're looking at pure processing, I would say he's the third quarterback this year. From watching all of their games, I came away with the following impression when it comes to processing.

  • Bryce Young
  • Anthony Richardson
  • C.J. Stroud

 

  • Will Levis

Just purely from what I saw in games.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted

No how good would Levis do on this test if they put a glass of milk on the table? If Bryce could only see the top half of the screen? Do they have 300 pounds guys trying to tackle you while you take it? Does the computer get tired 3/4ths of the way through the test and slow down?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
    • TD alt
      Monroe Freeling’s lovely GF

      By TD alt · Posted

      He was also apparently.
×
×
  • Create New...