Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did the S2 TEST take CJ out?


Ivory Panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Carolina Disaster said:

Definitely teams know.  That's why I am curious as to why the score hasn't been leaked.

The reporters who know seem like they don't really want to say the number because its bad, but feel comfortable saying its bad, which is a bit ridiculous. Why say it at all.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why even bother playing games anymore?  Just set up a couple of desks at midfield and let the opposing QBs compete for the top test score each week.  Then, the two with the highest averages face off at the end of the season in a Super Bowl Quiz Off. 

Must see TV.

Edited by NanuqoftheNorth
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So PFF did an interview with one of the co-founders, and he says a lot of these leaks are bullshit, but he does concede that all the top QBs in this class scored really well. He says that about 30 minutes in.

 

 

Edited by Dilla
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Dilla said:

So PFF did an interview with one of the co-founders, and he says a lot of these leaks are bullshit, but he does concede that all the top QBs in this class scored really well. He says that about 30 minutes in.

 

 

This was a good.

Listened to it on their podcast the other day.  It gives a really good breakdown and explanation.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's all remember that the time we're in is PEAK BS season.

We see teams "leak" all kinds of information to try to manipulate the draft.  I'm sure teams in the bottom of the top 10 are happy to say some BS to try and get folks to pass on a top QB so they can "fall" to them.

Let's also give a shout out to the "wait til next year!" folks.  They are more than happy to point out that next year's group is so much better than this year's crop of young men.  That's just human nature =P

I still have no idea who the Panthers pick.  Nor do I care.  They are going to pick a QB, and I'm going to be behind them 100% until they prove they suck.  I'm going to trust this staff to develop them and put them in a situation to be successful.  I mean, if they don't, then they'll be out of a job pretty quickly.

Stroud is an elite thrower of the football.  He showed some great stuff in the Georgia game, but we didn't see those improvisation skills much of the rest of the season.  Young is an elite processor who is a point guard of a QB, but to say he lacks ideal size is an understatement.  Richardson is a Madden Cheat code of a player, but will he be able to reach his ceiling in time for a coach to not get fired?  Levis eats bananas with their skins on...need we say more?

Enjoy the BS/smokescreens!  Two more weeks (right, it's the 29th?) until we find out for sure!

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Why even bother playing games anymore?  Just set up a couple of desks at midfield and let the opposing QBs compete for the top test score each week.  Then, the two with the highest averages face off at the end of the season in a Super Bowl Quiz Off. 

Must see TV.

It's just part of the evaluation process. 

If he drops because of an S2 score he might land in a better situation and consequently have a better career as a result. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/14/2023 at 6:59 PM, Dilla said:

So PFF did an interview with one of the co-founders, and he says a lot of these leaks are bullshit, but he does concede that all the top QBs in this class scored really well. He says that about 30 minutes in.

 

 

Came here to post this. Pretty much shoots down the rumors about CJ scoring low. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...