Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So this is supposed to be our new QB

bobcat91

By bobcat91,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Actionman0z Veteran

Actionman0z

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

Everyone has a right to their opinion. But some don't like it when you go against them and say you are wrong but won't admit they may be wrong.

We can both be wrong. I will take the size and accuracy over the college escapability. I can’t get past the size. 
 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ECHornet Grand Master

ECHornet

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

Is it just me or does Young look way more like Geoff than CJ? I watched CJ chunking 65 with a flick. Mind you I called Reggie Bush a bust. Translation is everything. How anyone thinks a guy who is never under center, backyard footballs the shizz out of it and can barely throw the ball 50 yards on a run will translate, it just baffles me.

I’ve seen him throw 55 in a game with no forward momentum. Try again

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PootieNunu Grand Master

PootieNunu

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Yeah we should get a 6 foot 5 QB who is built like a DE. He will definitely last many years in the nfl with that body type just like Cam did. Meanwhile look at how long Drew Brees played in the league 

Drew Brees' face mole is bigger than BY, get real. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Actionman0z Veteran

Actionman0z

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Eric4280 said:

The “I don’t want Young but totally support him if he were our QB” group is strong in this one… for the 47391st time. We. Get. It. 
 

How many times and ways are we going to repeat the same cheesy crap over and over again. You’ll never accept Young because of size. That’s fine. Awesome. But we’re sitting here trying to knitpick things that don’t exist? Trying to make anyone afraid of 36 year old Calais Campbell? Man yeah can’t wait for his blazing speed to destroy our tackles and blindside Young and spear him into oblivion.. 

Let me ask the Stroud crowd HONESTLY. Had he scored highly on this test, would it be disregarded or put on a pedestal? And I’m a Young guy and that test means nothing to me, the tape he put up does.

I wanna see that he didn’t score well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...