Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Frank Reich disputing the media label on him


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

The media said SF traded up to take Mac Jones till draft night they took the guy they really wanted. 

Could be either of the two QBs I'm sure no one outside the org really has a clue and the Panthers are enjoying the publicly of having everyone talk about them everyday guessing.

Edited by NCBlu
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NCBlu said:

The media said SF traded up to take Mac Jones till draft night they took the guy they really wanted. 

It’s also come out since then.  That the HC was the one who wanted Mac Jones while the GM wanted Lance.  And there was a battle over that which one they take.

 

Difference between that and now.  Our GM and owner and several others in the decision making process like the guy who seems to be leading per everyone.  And the HC is torn but reported that he is more of a consensus guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The good news if they take Young is; we'll be looking for a new QB within a couple of years anyway. I lived through 3 years of Rhule. I can live through a few midget years as well.

 

Although, at my age, I'm not sure how many more of these "Next few years" I have left. 

 

There is one Silver lining in all this. With all the running around the little guy has to do to find a lane. The games will be longer. Who can be mad at more Panther football?

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Shocker said:

At the very end there he says…”I was using reverse psychology there”

Reverse psychology is a persuasion tactic that involves advocating for a behavior that is different than the desired outcome. In other words, you say the opposite of what you want.

Season 3 Nbc GIF by The Office

Yes but was saying it's reverse psychology the reverse psychology?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

It’s Stroud. Always has been.

Idk about “always has been”. Even when we traded up no reporter could say with 100% certainty that we moved for Stroud. It was always worded as saying we liked a couple of guys or that people “believed” that Stroud was the guy. 

Stroud could very well be the pick and that’s fine, but as more time has passed it seems to me that people jumping on Stroud after the trade had more to do with the belief of what Reich’s prototypical QB is vs people being 100% certain that he’s the guy. 

 

 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gerry Green said:

The good news if they take Young is; we'll be looking for a new QB within a couple of years anyway. I lived through 3 years of Rhule. I can live through a few midget years as well.

 

Although, at my age, I'm not sure how many more of these "Next few years" I have left. 

 

There is one Silver lining in all this. With all the running around the little guy has to do to find a lane. The games will be longer. Who can be mad at more Panther football?

Actually 

The better news is.  If we take him, it may clean this message board up a bit.  

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, stan786 said:

Hopefully the size cowards will repent and stick around for years of success Bryce will bless upon this team.

Oh they won’t.  They’ll create a new account and never show face again or disappear.

Nothing

We saw a lot of this same stuff when we were looking to draft “another undersized DE with a Spin move from FSU”.  And we were “dumb for not taking Andre Dillard”

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, BlackPanther22 said:

Idk about “always has been”. Even when we traded up no reporter could say with 100% certainty that we moved for Stroud. It was always worded as saying we liked a couple of guys or that people “believed” that Stroud was the guy. 

Stroud could very well be the pick and that’s fine, but as more time has passed it seems to me that people jumping on Stroud after the trade had more to do with the belief of what Reich’s prototypical QB is vs people being 100% certain that he’s the guy. 

 

 

Guess we will see. I’m fine either way. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...