Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Grass field


poundaway
 Share

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, Smithers said:

I hate turf.  But everyone forgets about all the complaints about the grass field during the SB.  Some of these guys today could never play on the old school football fields with a dirt baseball diamond in the middle of it 

We had one of the best natural grass fields in the NFL before this change. Clinate here is a lot more conducive than Arizona.  The only reason for turf is for events like concerts 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Well Tepper got grass for the Chelsea FC game and ripped it up 12 hours later, not sure how long it took. I know the Super Bowl in Phoenix they put down new grass on their retractable field 2 weeks in advance and it didn't take to the soil at all obviously.  

If I recall correctly the AZ stadium was using some experimental grass during the Super Bowl.  

 

 

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

I do commercial lawns on large scale. The issue isn't so much the transplanting, it's the time that it takes for it to sufficiently root well. Depending on grass type there is a 4-6 week time period for it to root and then there is a period when the grass has to be trained to be mowed to a certain height. Different varieties take different lengths of time. I know that there are concerns from a financial standpoint of being able to do concerts and tearing up the field, but it is doable. The key to all of it is making sure the base has adequate drainage and I would install some type of heating underneath to be able to assist in keeping it relatively dry/thawed to prevent turf damage. Turf management is a science, especially on heavily used areas. Lots of variables and a constantly changing environment. 

At least at Wembley, the concerts are fine because they just lay some kind of plastic or aluminum flooring down on top of the grass for a night, they spent a lot on this hybrid grass field and it still didn't stand up to a few weeks of NFL and Soccer games apparently. The main issue is a Charlotte FC match on a Saturday and NFL on Sunday through the first month of NFL season. I think the soccer team can fug off and get their own little stadium personally

https://www.stadia-magazine.com/news/natural-turf/wembley-stadium-turf-under-the-spotlight.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

If I recall correctly the AZ stadium was using some experimental grass during the Super Bowl.  

 

 

 

Yeah it's on a 3" tray that they roll out during the day to get sunlight, weird set up. They should have just stuck with their normal formula because I've never seen that field look that bad

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NAS said:

We had one of the best natural grass fields in the NFL before this change. Climate here is a lot more conducive than Arizona.  The only reason for turf is for events like concerts 

Carolina heat and humidity is great for growing grass no doubt about it (Tepper needs to get with the program). 

However, as someone that has lived near the AZ stadium for several years, I can say they have a state of the art system that can grow grass and swap out fields as fast as anyone in the league.  Why they decided to experiment with a new variety of grass just before the SB is beyond me.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the most important thing is he put the logo on midfield right?  There is good and bad with every owner.  Maybe Tepper will listen to us on this as well.  My gut tells me he won't go back to grass unless he is forced too.  

Edited by Doyle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

This coming year, the only change in the NFL is that the Titans are going from grass to artificial turf. Players Association seems pretty weak on this issue.

They can call me old school but i feel football and baseball were meant to be played outside on grass.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BIGH2001 said:

I want turf too but people keep citing that Christmas Eve game where it was unprecedentedly cold. The grass wouldn’t have felt much better.

I get the argument but yeah you can't use a once every 15 years weather event as the main argument. How many below zero days does Charlotte actually see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah it's on a 3" tray that they roll out during the day to get sunlight, weird set up. They should have just stuck with their normal formula because I've never seen that field look that bad

https://www.statefarmstadium.com/stadium-info/about#:~:text=The roll-out natural grass,wide and 403 feet long.

The roll-out natural grass playing field is contained in a single 40 inch deep tray measuring 234 feet wide and 403 feet long.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...